Proof The Bible Is True

In the opening sentence in an article titled “Scientific Regress”, the author William Wilson remarks:   “Scientific claims rest on the idea that experiments repeated under nearly identical conditions ought to yield approximately the same results, but until very recently, very few had bothered to check in a systematic way whether this was actually the case.”1 The article is about science and the repeatability of scientific results published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. (Indented paragraphs are quoted from this article, unless otherwise referenced.)   Claims not replicated   Read More: Science and fraud – creation.com

Harvard scientists are planning to inject a small cloud of tiny particles called aerosols into the atmosphere. They then hope to study the behavior of these particles.1,2 This effort, called the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx), is designed to obtain information relevant to geoengineering—an attempt to deliberately cool the climate as a means to fight global warming. … More… …read more Source: icr.org     

What does Grand Canyon tell us about the Genesis Flood? ICR geologist Dr. Tim Clarey uncovers the evidence and shares about his work with the ICR Discovery Center.   Can Christians be confident about the origin of life? And what are genetic clocks? ICR geneticist Dr. Jeff Tomkins explains how genetic research confirms the Bible.   Listen: Grand Canyon and Genetic Clocks Confirm the Bible | The Institute for Creation Research

Does CMI just bash evolution? Learn about both the positive and negative arguments in biblical apologetics. …read more Source: creation.com     

The media often give the impression that evolution is scientific because scientists can tell us how it happened. In reality, the supposedly ‘factual’ accounts of where the universe came from and how the earth’s plant and animal life evolved are no more than imaginative stories. When pressed for details, the more honest scientists will sometimes admit that they really don’t know.   The big bang   According Professor Brian Cox, “You cannot claim that there wasn’t a big bang because you can see it”.1 Here he is not referring to the big bang itself, but what he believes to be [More]

By Dr. Don DeYoung Even mathematicians—studying the rules that underlie reality—are tied up in knots over the surprising twists of “knot theory.” …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Did God pander to human error in the Bible’s statements about nature? Read More

By Ken Ham Neanderthals have long been considered our evolutionary cousins and are usually portrayed as brutish and uncivilized as shown in some kids’ TV programs. But this view has consistently been shown to be wrong. We now know Neanderthals wore jewelry and makeup, made instruments and tools, and more. Of course, this is exactly what we’d expect starting with God’s Word, which teaches humans are all one race. Neanderthals simply reflect the incredibly variety within humans. And with yet another study, another evolutionary idea about Neanderthals bites the dust. The article starts with, “Neanderthals are shaking off their reputation [More]

Before uniformitarian geology derailed biblical history, the rails were greased by an unwarranted confidence in scientific history. What is the relationship between science, history, and truth? Carol Cleland, a leading philosopher of science, attempts an answer. Reacting to critics who claim historical science is less valid than experimental science, she defends their epistemic equality with both negative and positive arguments. Her negative argument highlights flaws in both the theory and practice of experimental science. Although her arguments ably undermine some modern distortions, her case against experimental science in this paper relies on the straw man of positivism—the idea that science [More]

By Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson Frello’s recent critique is helpful progress in our discussion, and it argues for the strength of the science in Replacing Darwin. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Avery Foley Matt Walsh misses the heart of the issue in his rebuttal of Ken Ham and young-earth creation. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

D.M. from the UK wrote in, sarcastically asking: “Which of the physical sciences do you believe in?” Dr Robert Carter, CMI-US, responds: Fantastic question! The short answer is, “All of them.” In fact just looking at a list of the people who work for CMI, I see PhDs in physics, nuclear physics, engineering, radiotelescopes and antenna design, geomorphology, molecular biology, plant science, plant nutrition, forestry, physical chemistry, zoology, and marine biology. We also have a medical doctor or two. This does not include the many other highly qualified people at CMI with up to master’s-level degrees. In short, we love science! We also have several theologians and educators on staff, to make for a very [More]

By Harry F. Sanders, III Evolutionists have serious problems with interspecific animal adoptions, while creationists are in a much better position when it comes to discussing the topic. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Atheist pastor keeps pulpit; star has origins “close to Big Bang”; acoustic camouflage fur helps moths escape bats; most kiwis support euthanasia; and more in this week’s episode of Answers News hosted at the Creation Museum in front of a live audience. Get more answers here: https://AnswersinGenesis.org

Why did God make Noah’s Flood so destructive? Why put animals on the Ark God knew would go extinct after the Flood? Read More

Archaeologists discover a spear point “9000 years old”? But it’s far older than either the biblical date for the Flood or Creation. What is the answer to this? …read more Source: creation.com     

The Nobel prize was just awarded to an international group of scientists under the misleading oxymoron of “directed evolution.” The media spun this event as propaganda for a naturalistic agenda by putting out news articles with titles like, “Nobel Prize in chemistry goes to three scientists who harnessed ‘the power of evolution.’”1 Göran Hansson, the secretary general of the Royal Swedish … More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Does misuse of a designed object imply it was designed poorly? …read more Source: creation.com     

By Tom Hennigan Your irresistible urge to snatch up that cute little puppy and hug it for all you’re worth isn’t just a feeling. It’s science. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

A major unanswered question for evolution is: why are humans the only species that can talk? Secular researchers have tried to find an answer since Darwin’s day, but so far they have not found satisfactory answers. One theory is that only humans possess the anatomy that allows speech.1 But the fact is that “humans and other primates have very similar vocal anatomy”—the physical machinery t… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Simon Turpin The BBC’s evolution quiz involved seven questions that had to be answered true or false. So, let’s take the quiz and test the BBC’s understanding of evolution. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Ken Ham A recent find at two archaeological sites in Croatia (just across the Adriatic Sea from Italy) discovered dairy lipids in several fragments of jars of pottery. This means these people were likely producing cheese and storing it for eating later. In most cases, pottery fragments finds are carefully washed. But the researchers decided to keep some pots unwashed so as to be able to do an analysis and see if they could determine what was in the jars. Had all of the pottery been washed, any traces of dairy would have been lost. So this is an [More]

Koko, the so-called “talking ape,” died in her sleep on June 19, 2018, prompting a resurgence of discussion about her ability to use human language. As a result of her death there appears to be “credulous repetition of Koko’s mythical prowess in sign language…everywhere.”1 Research into animal communication is important because one major problem evolutionists face is explaining the origin of h… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Dr. Daniel A. Biddle What do young people believe are the best evidences of evolution? A behavioral scientist sought the answer so we could target our training. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Sneak peek of latest Creation magazine. Some have speculated that the idea of atlatl-assisted spearthrowing came from watching herons hunt. …read more Source: <a href=http://creation.com/atlatl-heron-neck target=_blank title="The atlatl (woomera) and the heron's neck” >creation.com     

In 2011, the United Nations reported a world population of 7 billion. How long did it take for this many humans to be born? Evolutionists proclaim an ages-long history where the human population didn’t grow at all for millions of years but suddenly and recently exploded only thousands of years ago. Is this claim backed up by real science? How can we know for sure?   Listen: The Institute for Creation Research

Is a non-sentient entity a viable cause for the beginning of the universe? Read More