By Mike Matthews Since the beginning of modern science, creationists have strived to explain our world based on the unchanging laws of our Creator. …read more Source: AIG Daily     
Climate change heats up the headlines. But is the earth really getting warmer? More… …read more Source:     
We find evidence for the Creator’s grand design everywhere in the universe, from enormous galaxies to microscopic DNA. ICR zoologist and researcher Frank Sherwin explores evidence in astronomy, biology, and zoology to reveal the mysteries of God’s created universe. More… …read more Source:     
By Dr. David Menton Since many Christians have concluded that evolution is incompatible with the Biblical account of creation, we should investigate if it is a fact or theory. …read more Source: AIG Daily     
By Avery Foley Have you ever stopped to consider how even chemistry showcases God’s handiwork, creativity, and care for his creation? …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     
By Ken Ham Road ecology is the study of “how roads, and the salts and chemicals we put on these roads, impact nearby nature.” Well, according to a new study, roads are leading to “rapid evolution” on either side of the highway. This isn’t the first time we’ve heard of so-called “rapid evolution”—scientists are increasingly observing small changes over short timescales and calling it “rapid evolution.” But is this change within various plant and animal kinds actually evolution in the sense that new genetic information is appearing? Rapid Evolution on Either Side of the Road? According to study coauthor Steven [More]
Evolutionary biology is experiencing its most serious division in over a century. Last November, Great Britain’s prestigious Royal Society held a conference to deliberate if evolutionary theory needed to be “extended” or even renovated to accommodate fresh ideas from new discoveries. How bad is this schism? More… …read more Read more here:     
By Jeffrey P. Tomkins For many years, how many spawned the human race was not accessible. With modern genetics, scientists been able to more directly explore this question. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     
Have people really found skeletons of giants? …read more Read more here:     
How can Christians confidently defend biblical creation in an increasingly skeptical culture? What creation evidence does our own solar system display? ICR astrophysicist Dr. Jason Lisle answers these questions and more, sharing several logical arguments that confirm biblical creation. More… …read more Read more here:     
By Ken Ham Creation scientists are often accused of not being “real” scientists because they supposedly don’t publish in secular journals. But then anything that even hints at a Creator God—let alone a biblical view of a young earth, special creation, or global Flood—is censored and will probably never be published because it contradicts the prevailing mindset. Secular scientists are incredibly inconsistent in their accusation. In a recent interview, Dr. Danny Faulkner, an astronomer here at Answers in Genesis, responded to the claim that creationists can’t be scientists. Dr. Faulkner holds a PhD in astronomy and taught astronomy and physics [More]
What was the ‘Z-factor’ that convinced a university geology lecturer of a 6,000-year-old earth? …read more Read more here:     
By Jennifer Hall Rivera One of the most popular facets of science right now is forensics. But no investigative science is more accurate than an eyewitness account. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     
Exclusive: David Rives notes data preclude more than a few thousand years of human existence Watch: Does human population growth reject evolution?
Apologetics Press has written extensively through the years about the unsubstantiated claims scientists frequently make about dinosaurs and their alleged testimony for the General Theory of Evolution (see Lyons and Butt, 2008). Evolutionary scientists, eager to introduce the world to the latest alleged multi-million-year-old dinosaur, frequently make assertions without adequate evidence. Nevertheless, month after month, year after year, the claims are made: “this dinosaur evolved 200 million years ago,” “that dinosaur evolved into a bird,” “no large mammals lived during the time of the dinosaurs,” etc. Although many evolutionists find it difficult to see why creationists so often are skeptical [More]
How do evolutionists construct their scientific case for evolution? How can the creationist respond in scientific terms? …read more Read more here:     
Researchers discovered eight well-manufactured throwing spears in an Ice Age coal deposit near Schöningen, Germany. They are calling these the oldest human tools. What can forensic science reveal about the people who made them?   Portions of the Schöningen open pit coal mine were set aside for archaeological work decades ago. In 1997, Hartmut Thieme of the Lower Saxony State Office for Heritage described three spears that he found in the Helmstedt lignite coal mine.1 They were constructed to such exacting specifications that replicas of them performed as well as modern javelins in throwing tests.   The site also contained [More]
In a culture virtually convinced that the world is billions of years old, few people listen to evidence that clearly supports a young Earth. But that’s what the Bible teaches. And plenty of science, including four finds from 2016, backs up the Bible’s version of Earth history. More… …read more Read more here:     
By Callie Joubert The recent claim that “conflicting networks” in the brain that explain belief and unbelief in God cannot be true. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     
Secular speculations insist Earth coalesced into its current state over four billion years ago, leaving one huge problem: the young sun would have been so dim that Earth would have frozen. Secular astronomers have long invoked methane gas to defray this dilemma, called the “faint young sun paradox.” A recent study revealed two new reasons to totally reject methane as a rescuing device, leaving this paradox stronger than ever. More… …read more Read more here:     
Air pressure is the clue to answering this question. …read more Read more here:     
By Callie Joubert Is it possible that we are facing a situation where there is a massive production of wrong information or distortion of information? …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     
By Callie Joubert Researchers using neuroimaging technology claim to have found the cause for the conflict between science and religion (evolution and creationism) in the brain. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     
By Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson Today’s species are the link between the past and the present. The genetics of the species around us today contain the echo of the Ark. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     
Author dismisses creationist concepts but raises interesting questions about the inadequacies of materialistic evolutionary theory. …read more Read more here:     
A New Scientist article1 ponders a baffling enigma to evolutionists—‘living fossils’. These are creatures alive today which are identical to fossilised forms, believed to have lived ‘millions of years ago.’ Examples include the coelacanth fish (fossil coelacanths are believed by evolutionists to be 340 million years old2), Gingko trees (125 million years), crocodiles (140 million years), horseshoe crabs (200 million years), the Lingula lamp shell (450 million years), Neopilina molluscs (500 million years), and the tuatara lizard (200 million years). This poses a conundrum for evolution: ‘Why have these life-forms stayed the same for all that time?’This poses a conundrum [More]
An increasing number of evangelical Christian leaders have publicly stated that combatting ‘global warming’ or ‘climate change’ is a moral imperative.1 Likewise, Pope Francis recently called for action on this issue in a recent encyclical letter.2 However, at the same time, some scientists and environmental activists have become quite skeptical of alarmism on this issue, including former president of Greenpeace Canada Patrick Moore, physicist Freeman Dyson, and emeritus MIT professor of meteorology Richard Lindzen.3,4,5 Read more here: