Proof The Bible Is True

By Ken Ham Scientists in Canada have announced their analysis of a 65% complete T. rex skeleton, painstakingly dug out of rock and analyzed over the past 29 years. Their estimates put this dinosaur at 28 years old at death and a whopping 19,500 pounds. Now that’s a big dinosaur! One of the lines in the National Geographic article on the announcement reminded me of a common question we are asked here at AiG. The article stated (emphasis added): The find suggests that large predatory dinosaurs probably got older and bigger than paleontologists would have surmised based on currently available [More]

How do we know what we know? What is the role of authority? …read more Source: creation.com     

How has God used ICR to draw people to Christ? Why do we find marine and dinosaur fossils mixed together? How should Christians respond to climate change alarmism? And what can we learn about our Creator when we study ecology? Discover the answers to these questions and more in the April 2019 issue of Acts & Facts! More… …read more Source: icr.org     

In wrestling with the overwhelming evidence of design around us, atheists propose explanations somewhere beyond this world; even in imagined other universes. …read more Source: creation.com     

Does the Bible point to much genetic mixing in Israel? …read more Source: creation.com     

Clergyman and geologist Michael Roberts has thrown down the gauntlet to creationists with 10 provocative, and supposedly unanswerable questions about their ‘young Earth’ belief! (Part 2 of our answer) …read more Source: creation.com     

What with all the waves, water jets, hurricanes, and ocean heat? …read more Source: creation.com     

Clergyman and geologist Michael Roberts has thrown down the gauntlet to creationists with 10 provocative, and supposedly unanswerable questions about their ‘young Earth’ belief! (Part 1 of our answer). …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham Today many Christian leaders argue that the fossil record preceded Adam by millions of years. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Jason Lisle My paper was criticizing what Guliuzza has publicly written in which he denies the reality of natural selection: a claim that he has never publicly retracted. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Jean Lightner This brief examination of Jason Lisle’s paper highlights that misunderstanding about natural selection is more prevalent among creationists than he suggests. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Can genuine Evangelicals really come to some agreement? …read more Source: creation.com     

In the opening sentence in an article titled “Scientific Regress”, the author William Wilson remarks:   “Scientific claims rest on the idea that experiments repeated under nearly identical conditions ought to yield approximately the same results, but until very recently, very few had bothered to check in a systematic way whether this was actually the case.”1 The article is about science and the repeatability of scientific results published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. (Indented paragraphs are quoted from this article, unless otherwise referenced.)   Claims not replicated   Read More: Science and fraud – creation.com

Harvard scientists are planning to inject a small cloud of tiny particles called aerosols into the atmosphere. They then hope to study the behavior of these particles.1,2 This effort, called the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx), is designed to obtain information relevant to geoengineering—an attempt to deliberately cool the climate as a means to fight global warming. … More… …read more Source: icr.org     

What does Grand Canyon tell us about the Genesis Flood? ICR geologist Dr. Tim Clarey uncovers the evidence and shares about his work with the ICR Discovery Center.   Can Christians be confident about the origin of life? And what are genetic clocks? ICR geneticist Dr. Jeff Tomkins explains how genetic research confirms the Bible.   Listen: Grand Canyon and Genetic Clocks Confirm the Bible | The Institute for Creation Research

Does CMI just bash evolution? Learn about both the positive and negative arguments in biblical apologetics. …read more Source: creation.com     

The media often give the impression that evolution is scientific because scientists can tell us how it happened. In reality, the supposedly ‘factual’ accounts of where the universe came from and how the earth’s plant and animal life evolved are no more than imaginative stories. When pressed for details, the more honest scientists will sometimes admit that they really don’t know.   The big bang   According Professor Brian Cox, “You cannot claim that there wasn’t a big bang because you can see it”.1 Here he is not referring to the big bang itself, but what he believes to be [More]

By Dr. Don DeYoung Even mathematicians—studying the rules that underlie reality—are tied up in knots over the surprising twists of “knot theory.” …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Did God pander to human error in the Bible’s statements about nature? Read More

By Ken Ham Neanderthals have long been considered our evolutionary cousins and are usually portrayed as brutish and uncivilized as shown in some kids’ TV programs. But this view has consistently been shown to be wrong. We now know Neanderthals wore jewelry and makeup, made instruments and tools, and more. Of course, this is exactly what we’d expect starting with God’s Word, which teaches humans are all one race. Neanderthals simply reflect the incredibly variety within humans. And with yet another study, another evolutionary idea about Neanderthals bites the dust. The article starts with, “Neanderthals are shaking off their reputation [More]

Before uniformitarian geology derailed biblical history, the rails were greased by an unwarranted confidence in scientific history. What is the relationship between science, history, and truth? Carol Cleland, a leading philosopher of science, attempts an answer. Reacting to critics who claim historical science is less valid than experimental science, she defends their epistemic equality with both negative and positive arguments. Her negative argument highlights flaws in both the theory and practice of experimental science. Although her arguments ably undermine some modern distortions, her case against experimental science in this paper relies on the straw man of positivism—the idea that science [More]

By Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson Frello’s recent critique is helpful progress in our discussion, and it argues for the strength of the science in Replacing Darwin. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Avery Foley Matt Walsh misses the heart of the issue in his rebuttal of Ken Ham and young-earth creation. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

D.M. from the UK wrote in, sarcastically asking: “Which of the physical sciences do you believe in?” Dr Robert Carter, CMI-US, responds: Fantastic question! The short answer is, “All of them.” In fact just looking at a list of the people who work for CMI, I see PhDs in physics, nuclear physics, engineering, radiotelescopes and antenna design, geomorphology, molecular biology, plant science, plant nutrition, forestry, physical chemistry, zoology, and marine biology. We also have a medical doctor or two. This does not include the many other highly qualified people at CMI with up to master’s-level degrees. In short, we love science! We also have several theologians and educators on staff, to make for a very [More]

By Harry F. Sanders, III Evolutionists have serious problems with interspecific animal adoptions, while creationists are in a much better position when it comes to discussing the topic. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Atheist pastor keeps pulpit; star has origins “close to Big Bang”; acoustic camouflage fur helps moths escape bats; most kiwis support euthanasia; and more in this week’s episode of Answers News hosted at the Creation Museum in front of a live audience. Get more answers here: https://AnswersinGenesis.org

Why did God make Noah’s Flood so destructive? Why put animals on the Ark God knew would go extinct after the Flood? Read More