?We respond to a number of comments critical of ‘science-rejecting’ creationists. …read more Source: creation.com
A respected Yale University computer scientist has publicly expressed doubts about Darwinian evolution.1 In a column in the Claremont Review of Books, Dr. David Gelernter wrote that books by intelligent design (ID) proponents, especially Darwin’s Doubt by Stephen Meyer, convinced him that Darwinian evolution cannot be correct.2,3 More recently, Gelernter, along with Meyer and ID proponen… More… …read more Source: icr.org
By Simon Turpin Atheists accuse Christians of believing or having “faith” without evidence and remind them of the old adage: “Faith is believing what you know is not true.” …read more Source: AIG Daily
Six abilities of humans that make us different from animals, and are features of God and thus make us accountable to Him. …read more Source: creation.com
By Ken Ham Darwin’s seminal work is often abbreviated as Origin of Species, so you would think his book would explain the origin of the species. But that’s exactly what Darwin can’t explain, according to a Replacing Darwin! We’re going to send Gelernter a copy of Harvard-trained Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson’s book Replacing Darwin. This book powerfully demonstrates, from a genetic perspective, what Gelernter is saying—Darwin doesn’t explain the origin of species (or the origin of the information and code system in DNA). But Replacing Darwin goes further than that. It lays out a testable prediction, based on a biblical creation
[More]
One more powerful critique of neo-Darwinism. …read more Source: creation.com
An article addressing some of evolution’s difficulties was recently published in Aeon, a magazine of philosophy and culture. It was just another stark case of evolutionists embarrassed about the implications of their own worldview coupled with an obvious attempt to rewrite history. The article was oddly titled “Don’t misread Darwin: for humans, ‘survival of the fittest’ means being sympathetic.”More… …read more Source: icr.org
By Ken Ham “This monument is to acknowledge that we know what is happening and what needs to be done. Only you know if we did it.” Those are some of the words featured in “A Letter to the Future,” a memorial to a melted glacier in Iceland. Okjökull, known as Ok, lost its status as a glacier in 2014 due to its shrinking size. The presumed cause of the shrinkage? Man-made climate change. Throughout the article that reports on this melted glacier, these phrases are used, “the first glacier killed by climate change,” “the first casualty of climate change
[More]
By Ken Ham One of the biggest criticisms of biblical creation is, “Creationists don’t make testable predictions.” But that’s simply not true! Biblical creationists do make predictions—many of which have been confirmed by further research. Here are just a few of those predictions: The strength of several planets’ magnetic systems Helium in earth’s rocks The presence of radiohalos in metamorphosed sandstones Cold material from earth’s crust near the earth’s core The rapid reversal of earth’s magnetic field Harvard-trained scientist Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, one of AiG’s research scientists, wrote Replacing Darwin, a book that challenges the evolutionary worldview with research from
[More]
07/30/19 ‘The origin of species is exactly what Darwin cannot explain’ David Gelernter, a famed Yale University professor, has publicly renounced his belief in Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, calling it a “beautiful idea” that has been effectively disproved. Gelernter, who is known for predicting the World Wide Web and has developed many complex computing tools over the years, is today a professor of computer science at Yale, chief scientist at Mirror Worlds Technologies, member of the National Council of the Arts, and a prolific author. In May, the Claremont Review of Books published a column
[More]
How reliable are the conclusions of historical science compared to experimental science? …read more Source: creation.com
By Dr. Terry Mortenson Creationists and evolutionists look at the same fossil and genetic evidence, but they interpret it very differently because of different starting assumptions. …read more Source: AIG Daily
The Smithsonian Institution in Washington D. C. just finished a five-year renovation of its dinosaur hall at a cost of around $110 million.1 The renovated exhibit opened to the public on June 8, 2019. Naturally, the television news segment made the usual references to “millions of years” and the supposed evolutionary history of life on Earth. The most interesting aspect of the news story was a large m… More… …read more Source: icr.org
By Tom Hennigan Nature isn’t all peace and beauty. But even the dark side of creation can tell us something about God’s grace. …read more Source: AIG Daily
How can we understand the mysterious Denisovan people from a biblical perspective? …read more Source: creation.com
By Ken Ham A recent article from Fox News looked at five recent climate change warnings, and various experts weighed in on why these warnings were too over-the-top. …read more Source: AIG Daily
How can we begin correlating the Bible’s chronology with data outside the Bible? …read more Source: creation.com
Is there such a thing as “the best scientific evidence for creation or a young earth”? Soft tissue in dino bones, carbon-14 in diamonds, big bang problems. …read more Source: Earth age, big bang, nature of science” >creation.com
A critic says creation isn’t science. How would you respond? …read more Source: creation.com
By Troy Lacey The first Denisovan fossil outside Siberia has been found. What are Christians to think of this mysterious people group? …read more Source: AIG Daily
Taking the bite out of evolution. …read more Source: creation.com
How do we know what we know? The role of authority. Read More: Dystopian science 2 – creation.com
By Ken Ham Scientists in Canada have announced their analysis of a 65% complete T. rex skeleton, painstakingly dug out of rock and analyzed over the past 29 years. Their estimates put this dinosaur at 28 years old at death and a whopping 19,500 pounds. Now that’s a big dinosaur! One of the lines in the National Geographic article on the announcement reminded me of a common question we are asked here at AiG. The article stated (emphasis added): The find suggests that large predatory dinosaurs probably got older and bigger than paleontologists would have surmised based on currently available
[More]
How do we know what we know? What is the role of authority? …read more Source: creation.com
How has God used ICR to draw people to Christ? Why do we find marine and dinosaur fossils mixed together? How should Christians respond to climate change alarmism? And what can we learn about our Creator when we study ecology? Discover the answers to these questions and more in the April 2019 issue of Acts & Facts! More… …read more Source: icr.org
In wrestling with the overwhelming evidence of design around us, atheists propose explanations somewhere beyond this world; even in imagined other universes. …read more Source: creation.com
Does the Bible point to much genetic mixing in Israel? …read more Source: creation.com