• Search By Category

    • Search Box

    • Categories

  • Categories

  • Tag Cloud

  • Highest Rated Videos

  • Related Videos

  • Archives

Data from the 2015 flyby of Pluto confirmed biblical creationist predictions and posed serious challenges for the ‘millions of years’, evolutionary story.
Major scientific problems with the Big Bang are explained along with its incompatibility with Scripture! Related Articles: Big bang beliefs: busted (https://creation.com/big-bang-beliefs…) ‘Light from the big bang’ casts no shadows (https://creation.com/big-bang-casts-n…) Bye-bye, big bang? (https://creation.com/bye-bye-big-bang) Secular scientists blast the big bang (https://creation.com/secular-scientis…) Related Products: Dismantling the Big Bang (http://creation.com/s/10-2-188) Starlight, Time and the New Physics (http://creation.com/s/10-3-505) The Creation Answers Book (http://creation.com/s/10-2-505) Creation magazine (free sample copy) (http://creation.com/free-mag)
For more details visit: http://creation.com/creation-magazine-live-episode-34 Mars is an inhospitable, cold, dry world. Yet there is good evidence that it had huge flooding. Since Mars is not that much further from the sun than Earth, and is freezing, it shows how finely God tuned the earth’s orbit to support life. Main article: From Creation magazine 32(2) Mars — The red planet http://creation.com/mars-red-planet Related articles • Mars’ catastrophic geology http://creation.com/mars-catastrophic-geology • Life on Mars? http://creation.com/life-on-mars • Conclusive evidence for life from Mars? Remember last time! http://creation.com/conclusive-evidence-for-life-from-mars • Fountains of the great deep on Mars? http://creation.com/fountains-of-the-great-deep-on-mars • Face on mars http://creation.com/face-on-mars • Alien [More]
For more details visit: http://creation.com/cml75 Atheistic evolutionists would have us believe the entire universe is the result of a cosmic accident. That would mean that the earth really has no significance other than what blind chance brought about. Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss an article by Dr Jonathan Sarfati that reveals just how special the earth actually is and why that supports a belief in the God of the Bible! Main article: From Creation magazine 28(3) Earth is too special (http://creation.com/earth-is-too-special) Related articles • Universe finely-tuned for life (http://creation.com/the-universe-is-finely-tuned-for-life) • What is the Anthropic Principle? (http://creation.com/astronomy-and-the-bible) • Multiverse theory—unknown [More]
In 2004 New Scientist magazine published an Open Letter to the Scientific Community in which 33 leading scientists blasted the big bang. Their strongly-worded letter included statements like: ‘The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed… Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory… But the big bang theory can’t survive without these fudge factors… An open exchange of ideas is lacking in most mainstream conferences… [and] doubt and dissent are not tolerated’. With such growing [More]
For more details visit: http://creation.com/cml76 Why can’t the Big Bang fit with Genesis? Or does it? Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss an article from Creation magazine that tackles these questions, and introduce the fascinating book, “Dismantling the Big Bang”. Main article: From Creation magazine 28(2) “Dismantle the big bang and rediscover God’s universe (http://creation.com/dismantle-the-big-bang-and-rediscover-gods-universe) Related articles – Dismantling the Big Bang — God’s Universe Rediscovered (http://www.creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-188) – Astronomy and Astrophysics Q&A page (http://creation.com/astronomy-and-astrophysics-questions-and-answers) For more information on the creation/evolution issue visit http://creation.com
For many years, radio telescopes have been scanning the heavens as part of a program known as SETI. SETI stands for the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. They hope that one day they’ll stumble across a coded message—or information—from outer space. Then we’ll know for sure that there’s intelligent life ‘out there’, because only an intelligent being could have sent such a coded message. The irony is that SETI enthusiasts are inconsistent in the way they use this criterion. If they swapped their radio telescopes for a molecular biology lab and considered DNA, they’d discover encyclopedic quantities of coded information. Yet [More]
If you were able to choose the planet you lived on, which one would it be? Well, I would definitely choose earth, because it is so well suited for life. Whether you’re considering the Earth’s distance from the sun, or its gravity, axial tilt or magnetic field, one conclusion is inescapable. Earth is finely tuned for life. Many see this as evidence for a designer but others don’t. If earth wasn’t finely tuned, they say, we wouldn’t even exist so it doesn’t indicate a designer. But is that a satisfactory answer? Imagined you were dragged before a trained firing squad [More]
In recent years, NASA probes have sent back images of our nearest planet Mars. These images have prompted some scientists to suggest that a global flood once carved the Martian landscape, even though no liquid water has yet been found. The Bible records and event that certainly sounds like a global flood on Earth. Genesis records that, “All the mountains under the heavens were covered.” Jesus himself, referring to those not on Noah’s Ark, said, “The flood came and took them all away.” Unlike the illusive water on Mars, water covers 70% of the earth’s surface and water deposited sedimentary [More]
Is the big bang the only possible explanation for what we see in the heavens? How observations in astronomy fit with the Bible — this week on Creation Magazine LIVE! The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format. Related Articles: Bye-bye, big bang? (http://creation.com/bye-bye-big-bang) Secular scientists blast the big bang (http://creation.com/secular-scientists-blast-the-big-bang) Our galaxy is the centre of the universe, ‘quantized’ redshifts show (http://creation.com/our-galaxy-is-the-centre-of-the-universe-quantized-redshifts-show) High-redshift quasars [More]
For more details visit: http://creation.com/creation-magazine-live-episode-68 Evolutionary astronomers are often baffled by new discoveries in the heavens. A recent comet was discovered orbiting ‘backwards’. This does not fit with the ‘nebular hypothesis’, a popular evolutionary explanation for how our solar system formed. Main article: From Creation magazine 31(4) ‘Backwards’ comet perplexes scientists (http://creation.com/backwards-comet-perplexes-scientists) Related articles – Astronomy and Astrophysics Q&A page (http://creation.com/astronomy-and-astrophysics-questions-and-answers#comet) – More problems for the ‘Oort comet cloud’ (http://creation.com/more-problems-for-the-oort-comet-cloud) – Halley’s comet—beacon of creation (http://creation.com/halleys-comet-beacon-of-creation) – Comets and the Age of the Solar System (http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j11_3/j11_3_264-273.pdf) For more information on the creation/evolution issue visit http://creation.com
For more details visit: http://creation.com/creation-magazine-live-episode-62 One of the pillars of the Big Bang theory is that the light we see from objects far away has a higher redshift than closer objects. However, quasars with a very high redshift have been discovered in and near galaxies that have a low redshift. Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith explain what this means for the Big Bang. Main article: From Creation magazine 29(2) Bye-bye, big bang? (http://creation.com/bye-bye-big-bang) Related articles • What is redshift? (http://creation.com/bye-bye-big-bang#redshifts) • High-redshift quasars produce more big bang surprises (http://creation.com/high-redshift-quasars-produce-more-big-bang-surprises) • Astronomy and Astrophysics Q&A page (http://creation.com/astronomy-and-astrophysics-questions-and-answers) • Quasar with enormous [More]
For more details visit: http://creation.com/creation-magazine-live-episode-59 Many Christian leaders have embraced the ‘big bang’ idea wholeheartedly, encouraging fellow believers to welcome it in defence of the faith by using ‘science’ to prove there’s a creator even though it contradicts the plain reading of God’s word and Jesus’ own teachings! Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss why this is dangerous in light of mans ever changing ideas. Main article: From Creation magazine 27(2) Secular scientists blast the big bang (http://creation.com/secular-scientists-blast-the-big-bang) Related articles: – Scientific laws and speciation (http://creation.com/science-laws-speciation) – Hawking atheopathy (http://creation.com/stephen-hawking-god) – The importance of correct history and theology (http://creation.com/history-and-theology) – [More]
For details visit: http://creation.com/creation-magazine-live-episode-18 Dr Emil Silvestru is our special guest for this episode on astronomy. Some of the many problems with the Big Bang and other notions of the evolutionary origin of the universe are summarized and contrasted with biblically based explanations. Related articles: – Astronomy (chapter 7 of Refuting Evolution) (http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-7-astronomy) – Are Stars Forming Today? (http://creation.com/letters-to-the-editor-191) – New time dilation helps creation cosmology (http://creation.com/new-time-dilation-helps-creation-cosmology) – Evidence for recent creation from astronomy (http://creation.com/new-time-dilation-helps-creation-cosmology) – Light-travel time: a problem for the big bang (http://creation.com/light-travel-time-a-problem-for-the-big-bang) – Young galaxies too old for the big bang (http://creation.com/young-galaxies-too-old-for-the-big-bang) Also see – Astronomy and [More]