Proof The Bible Is True

A recent report on the genome sequence of the so-called living fish fossil, the African coelacanth, has some evolutionists scrambling to defend their story. More… Read more here: icr.org   

Newly described prints bolster biblical creation's explanation of dinosaur footprints. More… Read more here: icr.org   

What is the difference between figure 1 and figure 2? Both are patterns of light and dark. Both are arrangements of the same 12 particular shapes in the same groupings. Both exhibit a complexity of arrangement. The probability of either arrangement arising by chance is similar. Neither arrangement has been produced by any action of the properties of the material they appear on. But there is a world of difference between the two, and that difference is equivalent to the difference between the imagined ‘primordial soup’1 of non-living chemicals, and a living cell. This is because a living cell is [More]

For two centuries Newtonian physics had successes unparalleled in the history of science. Failures in Newtonian physics led to the modern physics of the 20th century. Read more here: AIG Daily   

Creation in-depth: The case against expansion. Read more here: creation.com   

As the earth settled down after the dramatic events of the Flood—and before ice built up at the poles—we find evidence that some forests sprang up in Antarctica. Read more here: AIG Daily   

Once again, DNA sequence that was once thought to be nothing but a genomic fossil has shown itself to be vital to human survival. More… Read more here: icr.org   

An international team of scientists have uncovered graphic evidence of the deadly terror unleashed on a herd of dinosaurs as they were buried under sediment by the rising waters of Noah’s Flood in western Inner Mongolia (figure 1).1 Dinosaur bones were first discovered at the site, located at the base of a small hill in the Gobi Desert, in 1978 by a Chinese geologist. After about 20 years, a team of Chinese and Japanese scientists recovered the first skeletons, which they named Sinornithomimus, meaning “Chinese bird mimic”. A few years later in 2001, the international team excavated the remains of [More]

How do we investigate specific geological features from a biblical Flood perspective? Read more here: creation.com   

Natural selection is an observable process that is often purported to be the underlying mechanism of unobservable molecules-to-man evolution. The concepts are indeed different, though some mistakenly interchange the two. So let’s take a closer look. There are two major questions to answer: How do biblical creationists rightly view the observable phenomenon of natural selection? Could this process cause the increase in genetic information necessary for molecules-to-man evolution? What Is Natural Selection? Below are some definitions evolutionists use to define “natural selection.” The problem biblical creationists have with these definitions lies mostly in their misapplication, as noted by the bolded [More]

Should sediba overshadow Lucy, or are both pretenders to the throne in human origins? Read more here: AIG Daily   

Several new studies show how plants adapt in different environments without changing their genetic code through a process known as “epigenetics.” More… Read more here: icr.org   

Perhaps you might expect a boxfish to “swim as well as a barn would fly.” In fact, navy engineers are learning important lessons from them. Read more here: creation.com   

The Genesis 1:31 teaching that God created everything “very good” sharply contradicts billions-of-years dogma, so compromisers try to explain this away. Read more here: creation.com   

Location is everything, and this same working principle applies to genes and their control sequences in the genome during embryo development. And not just simple location in a linear sense, but three-dimensional spatial location. More… Read more here: icr.org   

By Ken Ham Yes, you read that title correctly—human intelligence has been on the decline (since the Fall of Genesis 3), and now a leading geneticist agrees. Dr. Gerald Crabtree recently stated in an article that he believes genetic mutations are adversely affecting human intelligence. In his article in the journal Trends in Genetics, Crabtree claimed, “I would wager that if an average citizen from Athens of 1000 BC were to appear suddenly among us, he or she would be among the brightest and most intellectually alive of our colleagues and companions, with a good memory, a broad range of [More]

The first few chapters of the Bible describe what I, the author, believe to be the origin and early history of mankind, the earth, and the universe. Read more here: AIG Daily   

An explanation for the origin of gold deposits has long eluded and perplexed prospectors and geoscientists alike, but one new study may have unlocked just the right clues. More… Read more here: icr.org   

Sir David Attenborough and Charles Darwin were both mistaken in their evaluation of the animals of the Galápagos as evidence for evolution. Read more here: creation.com   

According to the First Law of Thermodynamics, nothing in the Universe (i.e., matter or energy) can pop into existence from nothing (see Miller, 2013). All of the scientific evidence points to that conclusion. So, the Universe could not have popped into existence before the alleged “big bang” (an event which we do not endorse). Therefore, God must have created the Universe. One of the popular rebuttals by the atheistic community is that quantum mechanics could have created the Universe. In 1905, Albert Einstein proposed the idea of mass-energy equivalence, resulting in the famous equation, E = mc2 (1905). We now [More]

Don’t Assume Too Much: Not All Assumptions in Science Are Bad by Jeff Miller, Ph.D. It might be tempting to get the wrong impression and think that making assumptions in science is a bad practice, especially upon reading various writings from the Creationist community. Creation scientists, for instance, correctly relate many of the problems inherent in the assumptions of evolutionary geologic dating techniques that tend to yield extremely old ages for the items they test. But do not fall victim to the same fallacy that the evolutionary community makes in assuming too much. As is the case with the fact [More]

Creation in-depth: The case for time dilation Read more here: creation.com   

Bird fossils do not generally ruffle paleontologist's feathers, but some amazing specimens from China's Jehol province—preserving eggs inside fossil bird bodies—might do just that. More… Read more here: icr.org   

The earth is only a few thousand years old. That’s a fact, plainly revealed in God’s Word. Audio file, download or listen online Read More via The 10 Best Evidences from Science that Confirm a Young Earth – Answers in Genesis.

  The red shift effect Halton Arp. Wikimedia: Alissaarp by Bill Worraker & Andrew C. McIntosh A review of: Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies by Halton Arp Interstellar Media, Cambridge University Press, 1987 Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science by Halton Arp Apeiron, Montreal, 1999 In these two books, Halton Arp elaborates his contention that since 1966, observations have been accumulating which contradict the generally accepted big bang cosmology. The key issue is the interpretation of redshift, the fractional increase in the wavelengths of lines in an astronomical spectrum when compared with laboratory wavelengths. Arp puts together a substantial body [More]

The evolutionary timeline is constantly being revised. The latest revision is a doozy-by half a billion years! Read more here: creation.com   

Creationist earth scientist Shaun Doyle discusses some of the differences. Read more here: creation.com