Proof The Bible Is True

In the opening sentence in an article titled “Scientific Regress”, the author William Wilson remarks:   “Scientific claims rest on the idea that experiments repeated under nearly identical conditions ought to yield approximately the same results, but until very recently, very few had bothered to check in a systematic way whether this was actually the case.”1 The article is about science and the repeatability of scientific results published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. (Indented paragraphs are quoted from this article, unless otherwise referenced.)   Claims not replicated   Read More: Science and fraud – creation.com

Before uniformitarian geology derailed biblical history, the rails were greased by an unwarranted confidence in scientific history. What is the relationship between science, history, and truth? Carol Cleland, a leading philosopher of science, attempts an answer. Reacting to critics who claim historical science is less valid than experimental science, she defends their epistemic equality with both negative and positive arguments. Her negative argument highlights flaws in both the theory and practice of experimental science. Although her arguments ably undermine some modern distortions, her case against experimental science in this paper relies on the straw man of positivism—the idea that science [More]

Credit to GoodScienceForYou Credentials of Dr. John Sanford: Cornell University Professor Bachelor’s of Science in Horticulture, University of Minnesota Master’s of Science, University of Wisconsin–Madison PhD in plant breeding/plant genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison

This class stemmed from the enormous volume of creation science material such as, books, magazine articles, and videos. At this point, there is so much evidence in support of 6 day literal creation most Christians don’t know where to start. This class provides Christians with a basic understanding of many of the main evidences. We have included what we feel are the most important creation science evidences. The goals of this class are as follows… 1. Develop a consistent Christian world view 2. Gain confidence in the bible as scientifically and historically defensible 3. Equip Christians with information to defend [More]

This class stemmed from the enormous volume of creation science material such as, books, magazine articles, and videos. At this point, there is so much evidence in support of 6 day literal creation most Christians don’t know where to start. This class provides Christians with a basic understanding of many of the main evidences. We have included what we feel are the most important creation science evidences. The goals of this class are as follows… 1. Develop a consistent Christian world view 2. Gain confidence in the bible as scientifically and historically defensible 3. Equip Christians with information to defend [More]

This class stemmed from the enormous volume of creation science material such as, books, magazine articles, and videos. At this point, there is so much evidence in support of 6 day literal creation most Christians don’t know where to start. This class provides Christians with a basic understanding of many of the main evidences. We have included what we feel are the most important creation science evidences. The goals of this class are as follows… 1. Develop a consistent Christian world view 2. Gain confidence in the bible as scientifically and historically defensible 3. Equip Christians with information to defend [More]

This class stemmed from the enormous volume of creation science material such as, books, magazine articles, and videos. At this point, there is so much evidence in support of 6 day literal creation most Christians don’t know where to start. This class provides Christians with a basic understanding of many of the main evidences. We have included what we feel are the most important creation science evidences. The goals of this class are as follows… 1. Develop a consistent Christian world view 2. Gain confidence in the bible as scientifically and historically defensible 3. Equip Christians with information to defend [More]

The Creation Science Crash Course (CSCC) is a comprehensive class on creation science apologetic material. This class is given from a literal, historical, and grammatical viewpoint of the Bible. This viewpoint leads to a literal and historical view of the first 11 chapters in Genesis. This class teaches 6 day literal creation and a worldwide flood. This class stemmed from the enormous volume of creation science material including, books, magazine articles, and videos. At this point, there is so much evidence in support of 6 day literal creation most Christians don’t know where to start. This class provides Christians with [More]

The Creation Science Crash Course (CSCC) is a comprehensive class on creation science apologetic material. This class is given from a literal, historical, and grammatical viewpoint of the Bible. This viewpoint leads to a literal and historical view of the first 11 chapters in Genesis. This class teaches 6 day literal creation and a worldwide flood. This class stemmed from the enormous volume of creation science material including, books, magazine articles, and videos. At this point, there is so much evidence in support of 6 day literal creation most Christians don’t know where to start. This class provides Christians with [More]

The Creation Science Crash Course (CSCC) is a comprehensive class on creation science apologetic material. This class is given from a literal, historical, and grammatical viewpoint of the Bible. This viewpoint leads to a literal and historical view of the first 11 chapters in Genesis. This class teaches 6 day literal creation and a worldwide flood. This class stemmed from the enormous volume of creation science material including, books, magazine articles, and videos. At this point, there is so much evidence in support of 6 day literal creation most Christians don’t know where to start. This class provides Christians with [More]

The Creation Science Crash Course (CSCC) is a comprehensive class on creation science apologetic material. This class is given from a literal, historical, and grammatical viewpoint of the Bible. This viewpoint leads to a literal and historical view of the first 11 chapters in Genesis. This class teaches 6 day literal creation and a worldwide flood. This class stemmed from the enormous volume of creation science material such as, books, magazine articles, and videos. At this point, there is so much evidence in support of 6 day literal creation most Christians don’t know where to start. This class provides Christians [More]

Design(er) Conference Site: http://goo.gl/JA3Rw6 Prof. Stuart Burgess (BSc Eng, PhD, CEng, FIMechE, FRAeS) has taught engineering design at Cambridge University and Bristol University in the UK. He has won many national awards for engineering design including the Turners Gold Medal and a Mollins Design Prize. He has published over 130 scientific articles on design in engineering and design in nature. He has seven patents and carried out design projects for industry including designing parts of rockets and spacecraft for the European Space Agency. He is author of the books Hallmarks of Design, He Made the Stars Also, and The Origin [More]

What is the nature of the relationship between faith and science? Can the apparent separation between science and faith ever be eliminated? Many scientists are convinced that evolution happened, does that mean it did? Join the discussion. The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format. Related Articles: It’s not science (http://creation.com/its-not-science) Argument: Evolution is true science, not ‘just a theory’ (http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-2-chapter-3-argument-evolution-is-true-science-not-just-a-theory) Does science need evolution? [More]

For more information visit: http://creation.com/creation-magazine-live-episode-6 Evolution says the earth is billions of years old. The Bible says it is about 6000 years old. What does science say? Discover the answer as Richard and Calvin discuss several scientific dating methods that refute the evolutionary timescale. Related articles – 101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe (http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth) – The earth: how old does it look? (http://creation.com/the-earth-how-old-does-it-look) – How old is the earth? (from Refuting Evolution) (http://creation.com/how-old-is-the-earth) Feedback – Immeasurable Age (http://creation.com/immeasurable-age) Also see – ‘Young’ age of the Earth & Universe Q&A page (http://creation.com/young-age-of-the-earth-universe-qa)

This episode tackles what is one of the biggest stumbling blocks to understanding the debate about origins: the difference between operational and historical science. Using an list of requirements for ‘science’ from a popular evolutionist textbook we examine evolution to see whether it meets the requirements. The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format. Related Articles: What distinguishes origins and operational science? (http://creation.com/origins-vs-operational-science) Who’s pushing [More]

Presented at Rocky Mtn Creation Fellowship 2012 – http://creation.com/miracles | Dr. Sarfati answers the question, “Can observational science verify when miracles occur?” Dr Jonathan D. Sarfati B.Sc. (Hons.), Ph.D., F.M. Creationist Physical Chemist and Spectroscopist (Australia) Education B.Sc. (Hons.) in Chemistry (with condensed matter and nuclear physics papers substituted) Ph.D. in Spectroscopy (Physical Chemistry) Honors/Awards/Associations 1988, F.I.D.E. Master title, The International Chess Federation

We could simply tell you there are two main types of scientific research—operational and historical—but we’d rather show you. And to do that, we want you to take part in a short experiment. (Don’t worry. You won’t even have to move from your seat.) What exactly is science? This engaging and short video from the supersonic Check This Out! collection will get you up to speed. Share everywhere. Imagine that a friend points to a building and asks you to tell them about it. Being the inquisitive individual that you are, you immediately set out to describe the building in [More]

Christopher Wayne Ashcraft is a creation scientist, speaker, and educator. He obtained the Bachelor of Science in biology from Wayland Baptist University in 1989, a Master of Science in biology from Texas Tech University in 1996, and a Master of Education from the University of Washington in 2008. Chris was a research technician for 12 years specialized in plant tissue culture and genetic transformation technology, and is now a high school science teacher at North Sound Christian School where he teaches Biology, Chemistry, and Creation Apologetics. He moved from research into teaching in response to a call from God to [More]

On this episode of ID the Future, Anika Smith interviews CSC fellow Nancy Pearcey, who discusses her recent book, Saving Leonardo: A Call to Resist the Secular Assault on Mind, Morals, and Meaning. Listen in as Mrs. Pearcey explains how naturalism filtered down to the public imagination from Darwin to art, literature, and film. Check out a review of the book at Evolution News & Views. …read more  

Story time with Doug! A reading from … John G. Lake, “The Complete Collection of His Life‘s Teachings” compiled by Roberts Liardon. More at www.FellowshipOfTheMartyrs.com

Listen Now On this episode of ID The Future, Jay Richards talks with Professor and author John Lennox about one of his latest books, Seven Days that Divide the World: The Beginning According to Genesis and Science. In his book, Lennox delves into controversial issues surrounding science and faith, answering common questions regarding apparent tensions between scripture and scientific evidence. Tune in as Professor Lennox demonstrates that science and faith are indeed compatible.   

Dr Jonathan Sarfati from Creation Ministries International explains why the creation/evolution debate deals with historical (forensic) science and can not be observed, repeated and tested. Creation is a much better explanation than evolution. creation.com Related Articles Science Questions and Answers: creation.com ‘It’s not science’: creation.com Evolution & creation, science & religion, facts & bias: creation.com Related Products: The Greatest Hoax on Earth? Refuting Dawkins on evolution – creation.com By Design book – creation.com Refuting Evolution book – creation.com Refuting Compromise Updated & Expanded book – creation.com

By Ken Ham Here is the second part of my critique of an anti-AiG article that has appeared on many websites in my homeland of Australia and elsewhere. The article originally appeared on a secular website in the U.S., and versions of it have shown up all over the internet on atheist sites and some news sites. The version of the article I am critiquing today is found at this link. If you have not read part 1 of my response posted yesterday, then I encourage you to do that now. Excerpt from the anti-AiG article: Science is a myth [More]

Warning: Evolutionists, atheists & other anti-Christians hate broadcasts like this because it exposes their religioius faith in Charles Darwin’s “evolutionary” metaphysics religious program translated through “scientism” which is disguised as science. Thus they will give these shows bad ratings usually without either watching the show at all or only a small percentage of it. The “Theory” of Evolution is simply another religion that was promoted by Charles Darwin and passed off as scientific fact. Dr Michael Girouard, a former evolutionist & current medical physician, details key scientific data that is left out of the public arena in the discussion of [More]

Warning: Evolutionists, atheists & other anti-Christians hate broadcasts like this because it exposes their religioius faith in Charles Darwin’s “evolutionary” metaphysics religious program translated through “scientism” which is disguised as science. Thus they will give these shows bad ratings usually without either watching the show at all or only a small percentage of it. The “Theory” of Evolution is simply another religion that was promoted by Charles Darwin and passed off as scientific fact. Dr Girouard, a former evolutionist & current medical physician, details key scientific data that is left out of the public arena in the discussion of origins. [More]

Warning: Evolutionists, atheists & other anti-Christians hate broadcasts like this because it exposes their religioius faith in Charles Darwin’s “evolutionary” metaphysics religious program translated through “scientism” which is disguised as science. Thus they will give these shows bad ratings usually without either watching the show at all or only a small percentage of it. The “Theory” of Evolution is simply another religion that was promoted by Charles Darwin and passed off as scientific fact. Dr Girouard, a former evolutionist & current medical physician, details key scientific data that is left out of the public arena in the discussion of origins. [More]

This clip is from our series “Interview with Dr. Walter Martin on Cults“. This clip answers the question: Do Mary Baker Eddy and Christian Science deny that Christ‘s sacrifice on the Cross can save anyone from sin?