Proof The Bible Is True

Question 3 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer focuses on the inability of evolutionists to explain how the huge amount of complex coded information (the “blueprint”) to build living things could come about by mutation, a mechanism is observed to destroy and delete genetic information. In this episode Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss the question and the attempts to answer it.. Related content • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/qe) • It is not the amount of change mutations produce, it is the type of change that is a problem for evolution. See: http://creation.com/train • [More]

Question 4 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer challenges evolutionists to explain how natural selection can be the creative process evolutionists require. Natural selection explains the survival of the fittest, adaptation and variation within a kind leading to the great diversity of living things. It fits well with the biblical notion that God created life with the necessary programming to live in a variety of environments. Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss the question and the attempts to answer it. Related content • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions) • Natural Selection Q&A page (http://creation.com/selection) • [More]

CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer summarizes 15 major problems with evolution. Some evolutionists have raised objections to the flyer. In this episode Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss some general objections to questioning evolution. Related content • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions) • Responses to evolutionist’s objections (http://creation.com/15-questions-responses-1)

For details visit: http://creation.com/creation-magazine-live-episode-14 Does radioisotope dating provide solid scientific evidence for ‘billions of years’? This episode summarizes huge problems with this dating method and highlights recent research results that supports a young earth. Related articles – Radioactive dating failure (http://creation.com/radioactive-dating-failure) – Dating Dilemma: Fossil wood in ‘ancient’ sandstone (http://creation.com/dating-dilemma-fossil-wood-in-ancient-sandstone) – The way it really is: little-known facts about radiometric dating (http://creation.com/the-way-it-really-is-little-known-facts-about-radiometric-dating) – RATE group reveals exciting break-through! (http://creation.com/rate-group-reveals-exciting-breakthroughs) – Diamonds: a creationist’s best friend (http://creation.com/diamonds-a-creationists-best-friend) – Radioisotope Dating Q&A page (http://creation.com/radiometric-dating-questions-and-answers) – Chapter 4 in The Creation Answers Book (http://creation.com/images/pdfs/cabook/chapter4.pdf) In the News – The large hadron collider: will [More]

How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?

How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years.

How did life originate?

Question 2 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer focuses on evolutionist’s inability to explain the origin of the DNA code. In this episode Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss the question and the attempts to answer it. Related content • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions) • Responses to evolutionist’s objections (http://creation.com/15-questions-responses-1) • Think you’ve got the answer? You could claim a $1,000,000 prize! (http://creation.com/millionaire

Question 9 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer has plagued evolutionists since the time of Darwin. Where are the transitional fossils? Evolutionary paleontologists have stated that the “missing links” are still missing and some, such as the late Stephen J. Gould, have suggested new ways of interpreting the fossil record due to the lack of transitional fossils. Related content • Dr Colin Patterson’s famous statement about missing links (http://creation.com/pattquote) • Famous Living Fossil ‘Link’ Idea Fizzles Further (http://creation.com/fizzles) • Question 10 — Living Fossils (http://creation.com/gu-qe10) • Who really opposed Darwin? (http://creation.com/holy-war) • The links are missing (http://creation.com/refutingch3) • Fossilized [More]

Question 7 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer reveals yet another problem area for the story of evolution: How did cells adapted to individual survival ‘learn’ to cooperate and specialize (including undergoing programmed cell death) to create complex plants and animals? Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith summarize some of the data. See the links below for details. Related content • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions) • Evolution of muticellularity: what is required? (http://creation.com/multicellularity) • Apoptosis — more evidence for creation (http://creation.com/apoptosis)

Question 11 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer focuses on the origin of meaning and morality. Without a moral law giver how do we get our moral laws? Evolutionists are at a loss to explain how good and evil originated via an evolutionary process. Related content • G. K Chesterton: Darwinism is ‘An attack upon thought itself (http://creation.com/chesterton) • Evolutionist: it’s OK to deceive students to believe evolution (http://creation.com/deceive) • Abortion ‘after birth’? Medical ‘ethicists’ promote infanticide (http://creation.com/abortion-after-birth) • The Biblical foundation for morality (http://creation.com/ethics) • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions)

Question 13 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer asks for the advances in science that come from evolution. Not only does evolution theory not produce scientific breakthroughs, it is actually a hindrance to science and irrelevant to scientific progress. Related content • Is evolution relevant or helpful to real science? (http://creation.com/helpful) • Genetic algorithms—do they show that evolution works? (http://creation.com/algorithm) • Understanding the difference between micro and macro evolution (http://creation.com/gu-qe4) • What! …no potatoes? (http://creation.com/potatoes) • “A Parade of Mutants”—Pedigree Dogs and Artificial Selection (http://creation.com/pedigree) • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions)

How did sex originate? That is Question 8 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer at the focus of this episode of Genesis Unleashed. Asexual reproduction gives up to twice as much reproductive success (‘fitness’) for the same resources as sexual reproduction, so how could the latter ever gain enough advantage to be selected? And how could mere physics and chemistry invent the complementary apparatuses needed at the same time. Related content • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions) • Responses to attempted answers (http://creation.com/15-questions-responses-2) • Chapter 11 of Refuting Evolution 2 “Argument — Evolution of Sex” [More]

The final question in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer asks why evolution, a primarily religious idea about history is being taught as science. Science involves observing how things work in the present, not speculating about origins. So neither creation nor evolution are strictly “scientific”. Related content • The religious nature of evolution (http://creation.com/evo-religious) • ‘It’s not science’ (http://creation.com/notscience) • Common structures = common ancestry? (http://creation.com/homology) • Atheism: A religion (http://creation.com/atheism-a-religion) • Atheism (http://creation.com/atheism) • Atheism, agnosticism and humanism Q&A page (http://creation.com/religion) • Loving God with all your mind (http://creation.com/logic) • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions)

Question 12 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer asks why evolutionist’s far fetched ‘just so’ stories are tolerated within the scientific community when evolution is supposed to be scientifically based. Related content • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions) • Kamikaze Icthyosaur article (http://creation.com/kamikaze-ichthyosaur) • Dinosaur soft tissue and protein (http://creation.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue-and-protein-even-more-confirmation) • Punctuated Equilibrium — come of age? (http://creation.com/punctuated-equilibrium-come-of-age) • Just-so-stories of sex and family life (http://creation.com/sexstories) • Just-so-stories for the punctuated evolutionist (http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j18_1/j18_1_48-51.pdf)

Question 6 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer focuses on the fact that one of the greatest challenges for evolutionists is that living things show too much design! If (as Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA, wrote) “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved” how do evolutionists know living things weren’t designed? Related content – List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions) – Why should science be restricted to naturalistic causes rather than logical causes? (http://creation.com/design-legit) – Design features Q&A page (http://creation.com/design-features-questions-and-answers)

Science involves experimenting to figure out how things work; how they operate. Question 14 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists’ flyer asks why evolution, which is a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science? Related content • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions) • Evolution: It’s not science (http://creation.com/its-not-science) • CSI and CMI (http://creation.com/csi-and-cmi) • Who’s really pushing ‘bad science’? (http://creation.com/whos-really-pushing-bad-science-rebuttal-to-lawrence-s-lerner)

15 Questions for Evolutionists Question 6 Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? Richard Dawkins wrote, “biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose.”4 Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA, wrote, “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.”5 The problem for evolutionists is that living things show too much design. Who objects when an archaeologist says that pottery points to human design? Yet if someone attributes [More]

note: The actual lecture starts at the 30 min. mark. Prior to that is a discussion about old Greek Bible manuscripts he has acquired and displays in his museum. Rocky Mountain Creation Fellowship ( youngearth.org ) was pleased to have Dr. Carl Baugh, Founder and Director of Creation Evidence Museum ( www.creationevidence.org ), in Glen Rose Texas speak on the subject “Hard Questions for Evolutionists” at their May 13, 2011 meeting. More than thirty years of Dr. Baugh‘s life have been spent researching the atmospheric conditions before the Genesis Flood, and he is Research Director for the world’s first Hyperbaric [More]

Dr. Lisle gives a lesson in logic and the fallacies evolutionists make. | Dr. Lisle‘s Blog: www.jasonlisle.com |  About Jason Lisle, Ph.D Dr. Jason Lisle is a Christian astrophysicist who writes and speaks on various topics relating to science and the defense of the Christian faith. He graduated summa cum laude from Ohio Wesleyan University where he double-majored in physics and astronomy and minored in mathematics. He then earned a master’s degree and a Ph.D. in astrophysics at the University of Colorado in Boulder. Dr. Lisle specialized in solar astrophysics and has made a number of scientific discoveries regarding the [More]

15 Questions for Evolutionists — Question 3 – Genesis Unleashed Question 3 in CMI’s ’15 Questions for Evolutionists‘ flyer focuses on the inability of evolutionists to explain how the huge amount of complex coded information (the “blueprint”) to build living things could come about by mutation, a mechanism is observed to destroy and delete genetic information. In this episode Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss the question and the attempts to answer it.. Related content • List of the 15 questions with supporting information (creation.com • It is not the amount of change mutations produce, it is the type of [More]

15 Questions for Evolutionists #10: How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? Professor Gould wrote, “the maintenance of stability within species must be considered as a major evolutionary problem.” See: Living fossils: a powerful argument for creation. creation.com Living fossils are fossilized animals and plants that look similar to modern organisms. Random mutations would have been occurring in creatures throughout such supposed vast time periods separating the assumed ancient and modern organisms. How then would ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds [More]

Does radioisotope dating provide solid scientific evidence for ‘billions of years’? This episode summarizes huge problems with this dating method and highlights recent research results that supports a young earth. According to creation.com All episodes of Creation magazine LIVE! are free to watch, download to your computer and copy.

Professor R. Luther Reisbig, Associate Professor Reinhold Schlieper, and Professor Jim Strayer all teach at Embry Riddle University. These three professors take on Dr. Hovind in the great debate of “Evolution vs. Creation Science.” This debate was very well put together, and there is a great question and answer time at the end. This very lively crowd makes this an exciting debate to watch! See for yourself the incredible frustration and anger that comes out at Embry Riddle University when the evolution theory is challenged.