Proof The Bible Is True

On January 21, 2015 the news broke—an Australian fisherman hooked a “living fossil.” Called the frilled (or frill) shark, this creature was thought to be 80 million years old. It looks mighty frightening, but is it truly “prehistoric” and somehow linked to shark evolution? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

Since the dawn of time, people have marveled at the caterpillar’s visible transformation into a butterfly. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

The much-trumpeted discovery of cosmic inflation has been shown to be wrong. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

It has become dogma that human and chimp DNA is ‘only’ 1% different, but this is very, very wrong. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

“Lengthy but excellent article addressing many of the issues on the origin of life subject.”  Admin This Part begins with the Narrator’s statement: “Ever since the publication of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, evolution has been fundamentally important to atheism, sometimes even presented as the intelligent alternative to belief in a Creator. … But some scientists reject the stark choice. They argue that Darwin is not a threat to belief and make the case for God and evolution.” In our previous article in this series, on Darwinism, we pointed out that Darwin said he would reject his own [More]

“Lengthy but excellent article addressing many of the issues on the origin of life subject.”  Admin Early on, the Narrator states: “For atheists there appears to be no better weapon to derail belief in God than evolution.”   Atheist Prof. David Sloan Wilson (Dept of Biology and Anthropology, Binghamton University, New York) backs this up with the rhetorical question: “Do atheists need evolution?” which he then answers: “Yes! Yes! Yes! The very conception of God has been muscled off the scientific playing field.” There’s nothing new about this, of course; atheist William B. Provine has said: “Evolution is the greatest [More]

Archaeological and palaeontological discoveries continue to push back the evolutionary story by millions of years. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

Like other extinct mammals that “suddenly” appear in the fossil record, this “discovery” is no mystery but a descendant of animals God created 6,000 years ago. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Even though CMI’s opponents often raise the same arguments to our questioning of evolution, it’s important to re-address such objections to show we have solid answers. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

The electric eel (Electrophorus electricus) lurks in the murky waters of the swamps and rivers of northern South America. With its highly sophisticated system of electrolocation, it is a stealthy predator, having the ability to navigate and hunt in conditions of low visibility. Using ‘electroreceptors’ to detect distortions in an electric field generated within its own body, it can locate a potential meal undetected. It then immobilizes its prey using a powerful electric shock, sizeable enough to stun a large mammal such as a horse, or even kill a man.1 Having a long cylindrical body it closely resembles what we [More]

When did the impact occur? …read more Read more here: creation.com     

Is the war on malaria plagued by “rapid evolution of insecticide resistance” in mosquitoes? …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

The secular media often report new evidence of stars in the process of formation. They say this supports star evolution. What do creationists think? …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Is the war on malaria plagued by “rapid evolution of insecticide resistance”? …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

By Ken Ham For years I’ve been challenging Christians to start their thinking on God’s unchanging Word and not on man’s changing, fallible interpretation of the past. The evolutionary story is changing daily with each new discovery and previously known “facts” are being discarded constantly. But God’s Word endures forever (1 Peter 1:25) and provides a sure foundation for us to base our thinking on. And it’s God’s Word, not man’s ideas, that is consistently being confirmed by observational science! Well, a great example of the changing nature of man’s ideas is Neanderthal man. Years ago Neanderthals were considered to [More]

“Excellent article documenting the fall of 3 evolutionary icons due to new scientific studies.” Admin The big-picture story of evolution tells that, over millions of years, natural processes produced millions of species from one or a few primitive progenitors. Did this really happen, or did God create separate distinct “kinds” of creatures about 6,000 years ago like Genesis 1 clearly describes? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

If you’re a fisherman who reckons that fish are now smaller, and there are fewer of them around, you’re very likely right. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

In 1995 the Hubble Telescope photographed spectacular columns of gas, illuminated by nearby stars, in a section of the Eagle Nebula. The enormous columns of gas in this famous photo have been nicknamed “pillars of creation” since secular scientists insist that new stars are being “born” within them. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

The hypothesis that Schnebly Hill and Coconino were deposited by marine sand waves on a shallow continental shelf is strengthened in light of these new data. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

In 2004, paleontologists digging on the small Indonesian island of Flores, discovered a few bones from seven different individuals that had not yet completely fossilized (cf. Brown, et al., 2004; Morwood, et al., 2004; Dalton, 2004; Lahr and Foley, 2004). The most complete individual discovered, labeled LB1, which consisted of most of the skull, as well as some of the leg, hands, feet, and pelvis bones, was thought to be a species of its own, and given the Latin name, Homo floresiensis. The media called it Hobbit Man because he was thought to be only 3½ feet tall. Paleoartists quickly [More]

Humans have amazing eyesight. In fact, many camera companies have looked to the eye in an effort to glean useful information in developing better photographic and video technology. As effective as the human eye is, however, there are certain things it cannot do. One of those is to detect ultraviolet light. But researchers have recently discovered a creature with the amazing ability to detect ultraviolet light—the mantis shrimp. Mantis shrimp are some of the most interesting creatures in the water. They have extremely powerful claws and lightening fast reflexes. But their ability to see ultraviolet light makes their eyesight one [More]

The McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms defines “natural science” as, “Collectively, the branches of science dealing with objectively measurable phenomena…” (2003, p. 1402). A naturalist, then, is a person who believes everything in the Universe must be able to be explained through purely naturalistic processes—with no supernatural help. Everything believed must be based on empirical evidence that is “measurable.” According to the National Academy of Sciences, “The statements of science must invoke only natural things and processes. The statements of science are those that emerge from the application of human intelligence to data obtained from observation and experiment” [More]

I’m typing this article on a personal computer. You are most likely reading it on some form of one, whether a desktop, laptop, smartphone or tablet (which are really just small computers). These amazing devices are all around us. Brilliant researchers have spent billions of dollars designing the most functional computers to help people all over the world achieve their goals. You may well know, however, that one computer is more powerful than any that humans have been able to design—the human brain. As LiveScience writer Charles Choi stated, “The most powerful computer known is the brain” (2013). But a [More]

Some evolutionists are hailing this as a ‘breakthrough’ in explaining life originating from chemicals by itself, but the reality is quite different. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

The cosmogony proposed is consistent with all creationist understandings of the biblical texts and has no light-travel time problem. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Rather than providing good evidence for the big bang model, the abundances of the light elements represents a significant problem for the standard cosmology. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

What does history say? …read more Read more here: creation.com