Proof The Bible Is True

By Dr. Georgia Purdom The earth is only a few thousand years old. That’s a fact, plainly revealed in God’s Word. So we should expect to find plenty of evidence for a young earth. And that’s what we find — in the earth’s geology, biology, paleontology, and even astronomy. Literally hundreds of dating methods could be used to attempt an estimate of the earth’s age, and the vast majority of them point to a much younger earth than the 4.5 billion years claimed by secularists. The following series of articles presents what Answers in Genesis researchers picked as the ten [More]

By John UpChurch Perhaps, in fact, it’s our discomfort with not knowing what to do with cavemen that makes us laugh. So just who were they? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Ancient wine vessel depicts sauropod dinosaur …read more Source: creation.com     

Do all scientists believe in an old earth? The fatal flaws of radioactive and tree-ring dating and the flat earth myth. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham In today’s world we often hear statements like “science disproves creation” or “science proves evolution.” …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Ken Ham The topic of climate change is always in the headlines. But it’s been dominating the news lately because of the Climate Change Summit and the climate change protests from young people around the world. These young people are rallying to demand that governments take their future seriously and to enact radical policies to limit carbon emissions. Some (including teenagers) are even signing a pledge that they won’t have children until the government does something about climate change! Is this climate change hysteria justified? Since the 1960s, scientists and government leaders have been warning of catastrophic environmental failure, [More]

Everything we see is mostly made up of empty space …read more Source: creation.com     

By Dr. Tommy Mitchell What if we could design a material for roads that would only get small cracks that resealed with chemical bonds as good as new? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Yale professor rejects Darwinism for top reasons many college students accept it. But does he believe the right thing instead? …read more Source: creation.com     

?We respond to a number of comments critical of ‘science-rejecting’ creationists. …read more Source: creation.com     

A respected Yale University computer scientist has publicly expressed doubts about Darwinian evolution.1 In a column in the Claremont Review of Books, Dr. David Gelernter wrote that books by intelligent design (ID) proponents, especially Darwin’s Doubt by Stephen Meyer, convinced him that Darwinian evolution cannot be correct.2,3 More recently, Gelernter, along with Meyer and ID proponen… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Simon Turpin Atheists accuse Christians of believing or having “faith” without evidence and remind them of the old adage: “Faith is believing what you know is not true.” …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Six abilities of humans that make us different from animals, and are features of God and thus make us accountable to Him. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham Darwin’s seminal work is often abbreviated as Origin of Species, so you would think his book would explain the origin of the species. But that’s exactly what Darwin can’t explain, according to a Replacing Darwin! We’re going to send Gelernter a copy of Harvard-trained Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson’s book Replacing Darwin. This book powerfully demonstrates, from a genetic perspective, what Gelernter is saying—Darwin doesn’t explain the origin of species (or the origin of the information and code system in DNA). But Replacing Darwin goes further than that. It lays out a testable prediction, based on a biblical creation [More]

One more powerful critique of neo-Darwinism. …read more Source: creation.com     

An article addressing some of evolution’s difficulties was recently published in Aeon, a magazine of philosophy and culture. It was just another stark case of evolutionists embarrassed about the implications of their own worldview coupled with an obvious attempt to rewrite history. The article was oddly titled “Don’t misread Darwin: for humans, ‘survival of the fittest’ means being sympathetic.”More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Ken Ham “This monument is to acknowledge that we know what is happening and what needs to be done. Only you know if we did it.” Those are some of the words featured in “A Letter to the Future,” a memorial to a melted glacier in Iceland. Okjökull, known as Ok, lost its status as a glacier in 2014 due to its shrinking size. The presumed cause of the shrinkage? Man-made climate change. Throughout the article that reports on this melted glacier, these phrases are used, “the first glacier killed by climate change,” “the first casualty of climate change [More]

By Ken Ham One of the biggest criticisms of biblical creation is, “Creationists don’t make testable predictions.” But that’s simply not true! Biblical creationists do make predictions—many of which have been confirmed by further research. Here are just a few of those predictions: The strength of several planets’ magnetic systems Helium in earth’s rocks The presence of radiohalos in metamorphosed sandstones Cold material from earth’s crust near the earth’s core The rapid reversal of earth’s magnetic field Harvard-trained scientist Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, one of AiG’s research scientists, wrote Replacing Darwin, a book that challenges the evolutionary worldview with research from [More]

07/30/19   ‘The origin of species is exactly what Darwin cannot explain’   David Gelernter, a famed Yale University professor, has publicly renounced his belief in Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, calling it a “beautiful idea” that has been effectively disproved.   Gelernter, who is known for predicting the World Wide Web and has developed many complex computing tools over the years, is today a professor of computer science at Yale, chief scientist at Mirror Worlds Technologies, member of the National Council of the Arts, and a prolific author.   In May, the Claremont Review of Books published a column [More]

How reliable are the conclusions of historical science compared to experimental science? …read more Source: creation.com     

By Dr. Terry Mortenson Creationists and evolutionists look at the same fossil and genetic evidence, but they interpret it very differently because of different starting assumptions. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

The Smithsonian Institution in Washington D. C. just finished a five-year renovation of its dinosaur hall at a cost of around $110 million.1 The renovated exhibit opened to the public on June 8, 2019. Naturally, the television news segment made the usual references to “millions of years” and the supposed evolutionary history of life on Earth. The most interesting aspect of the news story was a large m… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Tom Hennigan Nature isn’t all peace and beauty. But even the dark side of creation can tell us something about God’s grace. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

How can we understand the mysterious Denisovan people from a biblical perspective? …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham A recent article from Fox News looked at five recent climate change warnings, and various experts weighed in on why these warnings were too over-the-top. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

How can we begin correlating the Bible’s chronology with data outside the Bible? …read more Source: creation.com     

Is there such a thing as “the best scientific evidence for creation or a young earth”? Soft tissue in dino bones, carbon-14 in diamonds, big bang problems. …read more Source: Earth age, big bang, nature of science” >creation.com