Proof The Bible Is True

In a Christian radio interview, Richard Dawkins has the upper-hand in pointing out the inconsistencies of God using evolution to create, whereas Francis Collins fudges on faith. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham We’ve all seen the illustration—a knuckle-dragging ape follows a hunchbacked hairy man-ape who follows a more erect, but still very hairy, man-ape, who eventually follows modern man, dressed in a suit and carrying a briefcase to his meeting. This apes-to-man illustration is popularly used to show people the supposed evolutionary transition from ape-like to modern man. But is this “march of progress” accurate, even by evolutionary standards? Well, according to a recent article, this is one of the misconceptions many people have of evolutionary biology (and a reason creationists should not use the argument, “if humans evolved [More]

By Ken Ham When did humans first settle North America? According to the most common evolutionary view, this supposedly happened 16,000 years ago. But a new find of a mammoth tusk and bashed-in skull at an ancient butchering site in New Mexico is challenging this view and pushing the date back to 37,000 years. Of course, in a biblical worldview we know that both of these dates are not correct—so when did Native Americans first arrive? Let’s consider how biblical history can provide some boundaries for when this might have happened. God created everything in six days, finishing with the [More]

Archaeological ‘ages’ did not last for nearly as long as most people think, but where do things like the Bronze and Iron Age fit into biblical history? …read more Source: creation.com     

Attenborough presents the Galápagos islands and their animals as evidence for millions of years, but it is all much better understood as evidence for the biblical account of history. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Harry F. Sanders, III What are the limitations and possible pitfalls of statistical baraminology? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Does our size relative to the cosmos mean we’re insignificant in God’s eyes? …read more Source: creation.com     

Is creation an important Old Testament doctrine outside of Genesis? …read more Source: creation.com     

Jeremy DeSilva of Dartmouth College gave an evening presentation at the end of this year’s week-long American Society of Mass Spectrometry conference. As a human fossil expert, DeSilva’s lecture discussed a different topic than what these engineering-oriented scientists typically study. Whether technician or homemaker, everyone wants to understand more about where we all came from. DeSilva first wowed the crowd with his… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

An aerospace engineer who designs missiles shoots down evolutionary ideas. …read more Source: creation.com     

No, not even if time was infinite. Read why. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham “Oh, he’s such a Neanderthal!” Have you ever heard someone use such a phrase to insult a person with “backward” views or coarse manners? (A couple of our political leaders used that term recently in referring to the abortion issue.) While the man in question might be insulted to be called a Neanderthal, the poor historical Neanderthal behind the slight might take more offense! You see, Neanderthals weren’t backwards, coarse brutes—they were humans, just like us. Based on the archaeological record, scientists now believe that Neanderthals: Made and used tools. Made musical instruments, jewelry, and even make-up. [More]

The vast majority of people in the western world today believe the Earth and the Universe are billions of years old. This teaching is based on dating methods that are founded on assumptions that have not been proven and are riddled with error. In spite of these assumptions and errors, it has been common for many Bible believers to adopt this ancient Earth belief (or at least tolerate it) and attempt to find places in the biblical text to insert the possibility of billions of years.   The two most common attempts at this effort are known as the Day-Age [More]

Does the biblical account have support from archaeological remains in Egypt or elsewhere? …read more Source: creation.com     

Scientific investigation and research continue to reveal the Hand of the Creator. In this case, it is the remarkable electric fish (ray-finned fish, or knifefish belonging to the order Anguilliformes). The electric organ of these fish found in Africa and South America is nothing short of amazing. Electric organs help electric fish, such as the electric eel, do all sorts of amazing things: They sen… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Neandertals’ most famous homes were caves, but that’s not where they lived all the time. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ron Tagliapietra Improbability doesn’t convince die-hard evolutionists to abandon their view. As a Christian, I prefer deductions (as in geometry proofs) to counter evolution. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

William Pengelly’s 19th century cave excavations in Brixham, southwest England, encouraged support of the erroneous belief in the antiquity of mankind beyond the biblical timeframe. …read more Source: creation.com     

Cave drawings brought to life by exciting discoveries. …read more Source: creation.com     

Did Jesus die only for mankind or for other intelligent forms of life? …read more Source: creation.com     

Book by ex-creationist demonstrates not how evolution explains origins but how it wrecks faith. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Rob Webb Many believe that scientific laws confirm ideas like evolution, but we don’t ask why these laws exist, where they came from, and how can we even understand them? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Heather Brinson Bruce When modern evolutionary physicists begin to connect the dots with abstract ideas that can’t be tested, even they are alarmed. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Will nuclear fusion be the energy provider of the future? Joint European Torus breaks record and paves the way for ITER. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham The plain meaning of Genesis, how the “days” in Genesis 1 have been understood in church history & answering common objections to the historical reading of Genesis …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Why do most modern creationist scientists reject the vapour canopy theory? Biblical and scientific issues. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham After I gave a presentation on taking Genesis as literal history, including taking the six days of creation as ordinary days as the context requires, a pastor challenged me about our stand on a young earth and universe. The pastor said, “I just can’t accept your insistence of a young earth and universe, because the majority of scientists accept millions of years. Surely the majority of scientists couldn’t be so wrong on this issue.” I replied, “But just because the majority believe something doesn’t mean it’s correct.” The pastor responded, “But the majority of scientists use all [More]