• Search By Category

    • Search Box

    • Categories

  • Categories

  • Tag Cloud

  • Highest Rated Videos

  • Related Videos

  • Archives

Does having an extra forearm artery prove evolution? …read more Source: creation.com     
Our response to David Attenborough’s TV programmes ‘Conquest of the Skies’. The evidence shows beetles, birds, and other fliers were created; they did not evolve. …read more Source: creation.com     
Evolution is so flexible! It can be fast1 or slow.2 It can go forward or backward.3 It can add or eliminate structures—such as the alleged loss of parts of our voice box (larynx). Apparently, it can do anything that secular researchers need it to do. Indeed, when it comes to the amazing gift of speech, mankind stands alone. “When did speech evolve? Many animals, including chimpanzees, ca… More… …read more Source: icr.org     
By Dr. Kaia Kloster Do the scales on bird feet prove they evolved from dinosaurs? …read more Source: AIG Daily     
Is the palmar grasp reflex a vestigial remnant of evolution? …read more Source: creation.com     
Evolution would require new genetic information, but only loss of genetic information is observed …read more Source: creation.com     
We appreciate the beautiful butterfly, but not so much the pesky moth. However, the wing structure of both creatures is amazing, “The wings of moths and butterflies are densely covered in scales that exhibit intricate shapes and sculptured nanostructures.”1 In addition, much research has been conducted regarding the remarkable abilities of the bat to navigate and hunt in the dark for tasty moths. More… …read more Source: icr.org     
How plausible is evolution as an explanation of the tRNA subsystem? …read more Source: creation.com     
By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner The Bible reveals that creation was about 6,000 years ago, so how can we see stars that are millions of light-years away? …read more Source: AIG Daily     
By Ken Ham The idea that the universe began with a big bang is firmly entrenched in the minds of millions of Americans. But the so-called “science” isn’t nearly as settled as most people are led to believe. Many scientists—even atheistic, naturalistic ones—know there are big problems with the idea. And the new images from the James Webb Space Telescope haven’t helped those who cling to the big bang. According to a news report quoting one physicist (who does not believe the big bang happened), To everyone who sees them, the new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) images of the [More]
By Troy Lacey How creationists can interpret unique plesiosaur fossil evidence in a flood context …read more Source: AIG Daily     
Sir David tells the evolutionary story of how life proliferated on Earth, but the evidence he offers comfortably supports creation. …read more Source: creation.com     
A new dinosaur discovery in Rio Negro Province in central Argentina resulted in a very peculiar assertion.1 A bipedal dinosaur (walked on two legs) named Jakapil kaniukura was unearthed in upper Zuni megasequence rocks. But what made this new dinosaur so unusual was the category scientists placed it in. Their evolutionary analysis puts this bipedal dinosaur in the Thyreophoran (“shield-bearer”) category with dinosa… More… …read more Source: icr.org     
In a Christian radio interview, Richard Dawkins has the upper-hand in pointing out the inconsistencies of God using evolution to create, whereas Francis Collins fudges on faith. …read more Source: creation.com     
Most of us are familiar with the incredible ability of different animal groups to migrate (such as birds).1,2 But what about invertebrates? Recently, scientists discovered that a moth called the death’s-head hawkmoth (as well as the dragonfly3) flies for miles, keeping on a path that’s narrow and straight. For the first time, scientists have continu… More… …read more Source: icr.org     
Silent mutations do not affect the protein sequence, but new research has shown that they often have strongly negative effects, putting another nail in the coffin of Neo-Darwinism. …read more Source: creation.com     
Most people say that evolution is true, so why do a growing number of conventional scientists doubt it? These skeptics don’t question evolution’s premise that nature alone is somehow responsible for crafting creatures out of stardust. The debate centers on how nature might have achieved this incredible feat. Where and how did the first complicated structures (like eyes) arise through natural processes? Indiana … More… …read more Source: icr.org     
By Ken Ham We’ve all seen the illustration—a knuckle-dragging ape follows a hunchbacked hairy man-ape who follows a more erect, but still very hairy, man-ape, who eventually follows modern man, dressed in a suit and carrying a briefcase to his meeting. This apes-to-man illustration is popularly used to show people the supposed evolutionary transition from ape-like to modern man. But is this “march of progress” accurate, even by evolutionary standards? Well, according to a recent article, this is one of the misconceptions many people have of evolutionary biology (and a reason creationists should not use the argument, “if humans evolved [More]
How was the soft tissue of an ammonite fossilized without its shell attached? …read more Source: creation.com     
By Ken Ham Australia’s Great Barrier Reef is an internationally famous icon. The colorful corals, variety of creatures, and undulating waves make a massive, jaw-droppingly beautiful environment that can even be viewed from space. Now, environmental activists have been saying for decades that the reef is on the edge of collapse, but—defying their predictions—the reef just had a record growth year. According to reports, Coral cover on two-thirds of the iconic reef, which is seen as a bellwether of ocean health, has reached its highest level since records began 36 years ago. Now this seems like it should be good [More]
By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling In a few rare spots, geologists find fossils of strange eight-foot-tall “mushrooms.” What do they tell us about the mysterious world they came from? …read more Source: AIG Daily     
The newly named dinosaurs Paralitherizinosaurus was described as ‘scissorhands’ with long slashing claws, but what were they used to eat? …read more Source: creation.com     
Sir David Attenborough and Charles Darwin were both mistaken in their evaluation of the animals of the Galápagos as evidence for evolution. …read more Source: creation.com     
An engaging new book featuring Australia’s fantastic fauna. …read more Source: creation.com     
By Devon Spencer, DVM Recent research looks to obtain a more robust understanding of what makes penguins unique both physically and genetically. …read more Source: AIG Daily     
By Ken Ham When did humans first settle North America? According to the most common evolutionary view, this supposedly happened 16,000 years ago. But a new find of a mammoth tusk and bashed-in skull at an ancient butchering site in New Mexico is challenging this view and pushing the date back to 37,000 years. Of course, in a biblical worldview we know that both of these dates are not correct—so when did Native Americans first arrive? Let’s consider how biblical history can provide some boundaries for when this might have happened. God created everything in six days, finishing with the [More]
As any dog owner will tell you, the smelling ability of Rover is incredible.1 Surprisingly, however, “little is known about the structure of their olfactory [smelling] system.”2 And what scientists do know about the anatomy and biochemistry of olfaction points clearly to creation.3 But now, using a brain map, researchers have connected olfaction to thought and reasoning centers in dogs.&… More… …read more Source: icr.org