The creation of original, distinct creature kinds confronts the evolutionary teaching that animals can endlessly morph from one form to another. Recent news reports reveal two clear illustrations of sea creatures living and reproducing according to their kind right from the start. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org
Bodies bounce while jogging or performing any number of other vigorous activities, usually without getting dizzy. However, bodies get dizzy when they are “bounced” from the outside, like while on a boat or airplane. What’s the difference? Researchers pinpointed amazing new details behind the mechanism that maintains balance during voluntary motion, but their notion of its origins clearly misses the mark. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org
By Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson New data agree with the expectations from D-loop results, further confirming the origin of humans within 6000 years and rejecting evolutionary timescales. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
By Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell The ocelloid—a camera-like “eye” inside single-celled marine plankton—is an amazing design, but it does not represent an evolutionary triumph. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
By Ken Ham Shoulder blade shapes have been compared between humans and existing apes as well as fossilized apes. Well, evolutionists wouldn’t call the fossils apes. An article stated that a recent study suggests that the last common ancestor (often shortened to LCA) of humans and apes “looked a lot like a chimpanzee or gorilla . . . at least in the shoulder.” The PNAS study, titled “Fossil hominin shoulders support an African ape-like last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees,” explains, A laterally facing shoulder blade allows humans to store energy in their shoulders, much like a slingshot, facilitating
[More]
By Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell Zhenyuanlong is not a blow to biblical belief or proof that dinosaurs evolved into birds, but a testimony to avian diversity of the pre-Flood world. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
Fossil leaves show that leaf miners have existed along with leaves and questions the long ages attributed to these fossils. …read more Read more here: creation.com
How James Hutton introduced deep time, and created the greatest error in geology today. …read more Read more here: creation.com
By Ken Ham A recent article in the Sunday Times claims that “of all the scientific fields, evolution probably carries the most common misconceptions.” It then goes on to describe 10 alleged misconceptions of evolutionary ideas. Many of these misconceptions are topics we’ve already pointed out and covered on our website. As Christians we need to be careful not to misrepresent what evolutionists believe, so we encourage Christians to avoid certain arguments. But some of the alleged misconceptions about evolution that made the Sunday Times list are actually not misconceptions at all! The article begins with a common argument that
[More]
Homo naledi is another case of selective interpretation of the evidence to ‘prove’ evolution of man from apelike ancestors. …read more Read more here: creation.com
Explained by biblical history. …read more Read more here: creation.com
Engineers look to copy the hummingbird’s aerodynamic secrets in their designs for miniature flying robots …read more Read more here: creation.com
Even children learn that plants and animals depend on one another. Plants release oxygen for animals to breathe, and plants make food—mostly sugar—for animals to eat. In turn, animals produce carbon dioxide so plants can grow using sunlight. This ecological interdependence shows enough divine design to inspire any honest thinker to consider a Creator, but a recently discovered interaction between pitcher plants and bats shows even more. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org
How did our solar system get here? Those who dismiss any possibility of creation imagine ways that pure natural forces might set in motion the sun, each unique planet and their moons. New computer modeling results seem to show promise—but only when they overlook or assume obvious and important factors. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org
By Ken Ham Do you realize that Homo means different things to different scientists? When an evolutionist classifies a fossil as Homo, he does not mean the same thing a Bible-believing scientist does. There has already been a lot of buzz on evolutionists’ websites and blogs mocking our assessment that the published evidence does not support a Homo designation for Homo naledi. Ignoring how much evolutionary scientists disagree among themselves, some make much of disagreement among creationists about Homo naledi‘s identity. One in particular, in “Bones of Contention: How Will Creationists Respond To A Huge New Hominid Fossil Find?,”predicted responses
[More]
Despite what evolutionists say, mutations are not evidence for evolution but rather evidence against it. …read more Read more here: creation.com
By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling Every year “Cotton Castle” in Turkey attracts a million visitors. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
By Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson Some assert that humans and chimpanzees are only 1 to 2% different, but careful re-tallying suggests there is a gigantic genetic gap between the two species. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
How studying the influenza virus gives clues about natural selection. …read more Read more here: creation.com
A BBC News story reported on September 10 the discovery of a “new human-like species” in Africa, stating “researchers claim that the discovery will change ideas about our human ancestors.” As always, we at the Institute for Creation Research are extremely skeptical, taking such breaking news stories with a little more than a grain of salt. We have found that with more time and research, the preliminary spectacular claims of alleged “human ancestors” dissolve into a footnote, a non-story. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org
Spring rains flooded the Dallas area this year, including Lake Grapevine which is about 10 miles west of the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) campus. Record water levels submerged entire lakeside parks and adjacent roads. As the water slowly receded, it revealed a reshaped shoreline—and dinosaur tracks. What kinds of creatures made these marks? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org
By Dr. Danny Faulkner We here at Answers in Genesis believe that life is unique to Earth, so is the discovery of Kepler-452b a problem for us? …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
Progressive creationist Hugh Ross has declared as fact something about the alleged big bang that even evolutionists want to be true but have not claimed. …read more Read more here: creation.com
By Ken Ham The media is buzzing with news that another supposed human ancestor has been found in an African cave. It was discovered by evolutionist Lee Berger, whose controversial claims about Australopithecus sediba have been in the news off and on since 2011. (You can read them in “Sediba with a Little Sleight of Hand,” “Sediba Fossils Fail to Connect the Evolutionary Dots,” “Karabo: The Smiling Missing Link,” and “Can Karabo Catch Up with Lucy’s Legacy?”) Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell, who frequently writes articles for Answers in Genesis, is working on a full-length article on this discovery, so keep checking
[More]
Richard Dawkins says a rabbit fossil in the Precambrian would be evidence against evolution, but would that really be the case? …read more Read more here: creation.com
Despite claims that stars formed from primordial clouds of gas, the known laws of physics show that to be impossible. …read more Read more here: creation.com
By Dr. Danny Faulkner The asymmetry between matter and antimatter is not a problem if God created the universe as Genesis 1 says that He did. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily