Proof The Bible Is True

By Heather Brinson Bruce You don?t need to be an expert to appreciate the fine details that make this sleek machine run. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling Secular scientists claim it’s easy to disprove the Bible’s 6,000-year history: just count the tree rings. Is this dating method reliable? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

by Jeffrey Tomkins and Timothy Clarey* Fossils keep revealing biomolecules that should be completely deteriorated and disintegrated if they are millions of years old. Scientists have just discovered intact starch granules in plant tissues alleged to be 280 million years old.1 Fossils k… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling Present volcano eruptions are not the key to understanding the earth’s past. The volume of past lava deposits is too large to be explained by today’s activity. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Bodie Hodge People make the claim that it is impossible to get 7 billion descendants from two people. In kindness, where does the Bible say this is impossible? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

A recent paper published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B may have inadvertently confirmed what the Bible revealed to us all along: Kinds only reproduce after their kinds.1 Kinds only reproduce after their kinds. <a target=_blank href="https://ctt.ac/oV8CG" target="_bla… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Bajau divers of the Central Sulawesi peninsula in Indonesia are able to hold their breath and dive to amazing depths of over 200 feet using only rock weights and hand-made wooden goggles. Researchers recently compared the Bajaus’ spleen size to that of their neighbors and found the Bajaus’ are considerably larger, and that this increased size may extend the time divers can hold their breath.1 We learn two things from … More… …read more Source: icr.org     

The argument “common design means common ancestry” falsely claims to prove an assumption about the past by pointing out similar body plans in organisms today. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Since Lee Berger and his team announced their discovery of Homo naledi,1 they have been claiming that the bones found in the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa, were deliberately disposed by living Homo naledi.2 While some objected to this interpretation,3-5 Berger’s team stuck with it and continued to promulgate the human-like behavior associated with purposeful burial.6 … More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Tom Hennigan Creationists get so focused on finding evidence of design in individual organisms that they overlook the bigger picture—design of the ecosystems. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Did bacteria gain the ability to eat nylon through a random frame-shift mutation? …read more Source: creation.com     

Like a thief in the night, this creature from the deep raids the fruits of the forest. …read more Source: creation.com     

How were they discovered? Why are they important for the creation/evolution debate? …read more Source: creation.com     

A common seaweed called rainbow wrack grows along Europe’s coasts, including tidal rock pools in the UK. Deep inside its cells, this marine plant uses oily chemicals to make opal look-alikes—“living opals.” This discovery intrigues nanotechnologists. Opals are gemstones renowned for the way they make white light shimmer with thin rainbow colors. Deep inside the opals, light bounces off very tiny ball… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Rock layers tells us a lot about the earth’s past, but some geologists have an ingrained bias when they look at some amazing features. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham Evolutionists couldn’t have been more wrong about Neanderthals. When this human variety (now considered by evolutionists to be a cousin to modern man) was first discovered, they were considered primitive and brutish, hence the insult of calling someone a “Neanderthal.” Many museums still depict Neanderthals in this fashion. But nothing could be further from the truth. Further research has shown that Neanderthals buried their dead with rituals, made and wore jewelry, wore cosmetics, played instruments, and even had children with “modern” humans. In other words, they were human, highly intelligent, and creative, just like us. The evolutionary [More]

“What was old is new again” describes fashion cycles where young people today are wearing clothes and buying furniture styled after that of their grandparents. Evolutionary biology also has similar cycles, especially when it comes to “new” ideas that are constantly revising the ill-defined concept of natural selection. W. Ford Doolittle and S. Andrew Inkpen recently advanced their new take on natural selection that a… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

The honey bee is a wonderful example of intricate design and complex genetic information. …read more Source: creation.com     

New plastic-munching Ideonella sakaiensis bacterium was intelligently engineered, not randomly evolved. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling Conventional wisdom assumes the mud in earth’s mudrocks took millions of years to settle. What do new experiments suggest? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Evolutionists struggle to explain an enormous fossil graveyard that includes sea, land, and flying creatures. …read more Source: creation.com     

ICR scientists have long pointed out that fossils, contrary to popular misperception, do not provide evidence for evolution, and a recent secular dinosaur study confirms this.1 ICR scientists have long pointed out that fossils…do not provide evidence for evolution, and a recent secular dinosaur stud… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Recently, moth fossils imbedded in both ancient amber and rocks have been analyzed in excruciating detail. Using a variety of high-powered microscopes, scientists wanted to see how much evolution occurred in the alleged 200 million years separating the fossils from their modern living versions. But the ancient creatures are exactly the same as the modern.1 So, why didn’t the little rascals evolve? More… …read more Source: icr.org     

A look at the problems associated with evolutionary origin-of-life scenarios for our world. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson The ethical use of human stem cells controversy has cooled and almost subsided. But not for the reasons you might expect. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

On April 18 of this year, The Public Broadcasting Corporation aired a documentary on its television show POV entitled “Bill Nye, Science Guy.” It can be viewed at the pbs.org website.1 Although this documentary was very critical of those it deemed “anti-science,” especially biblical creationists and “climate change deniers,” the film may have inadvertently highlighted evidence for a yo… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

In the last few decades, there has been a lot of discussion by prominent paleontologists who imply that dinosaurs and birds are closely related. Many of these paleontologists go even further, suggesting that dinosaurs didn’t actually go extinct, but evolved directly into birds. Much of the supposed evidence that supports this argument comes from comparative anatomy. In the middle of this controversy is the so-called “transitiona… More… …read more Source: icr.org