Proof The Bible Is True

The discovery of a new fossil in northwest China sent shockwaves rippling through the secular paleontological world. The new sauropod (longneck) dinosaur called Lingwulong shenqi, or “amazing dragon from Lingwu” was excavated from an area and a sedimentary layer that secular science believed was both the wrong geological place and time for that fossil.1 Xing Xu, from the Chinese Academy… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Ken Ham Evolutionary scientists have recently announced the “surprising discovery” of a dinosaur similar to Diplodocus (one of the long-necked dinosaurs) in a region of northwest China where these dinosaurs were not believed to have lived, fifteen million years earlier than scientists thought they had evolved. This discovery now “forces a complete re-evaluation of the origins and evolution of these animals.” When I point out that the evolutionary story and timeline have been revised again many evolutionists will quickly declare, “that’s science! The process of science changes our knowledge as we discover more evidence and data.” But what’s wrong [More]

Two recent news stories, one from the Carnegie Institute for Science1 and another from an issue of Nuclear Technology,2 shed light on an icon of “deep time” radioisotope dating—the Isochron model. The former reported evidence that quartz crystals in samples of a granite body can crystallize at temperatures below what has been conventional orthodoxy in the geochronology field for years. The la… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

The Sahara Desert was once well-watered. How did it become a desert?

By Ken Ham Tour most museums or open almost all geology textbooks, and you’ll see fossils presented through one lens: they were deposited slowly and gradually over millions of years. But there’s an entirely different way of looking at fossils that actually explains what we observe—the global flood of Noah’s day. In a biblical worldview, fossils are not the result of millions of years of slow and gradual processes. Most were rapidly buried during the yearlong flood. This rapid, catastrophic burial explains the geological features we see: Preservation of soft parts and creatures like jellyfish that have no hard parts. [More]

After nearly sixty years of misinterpreting these bones from ‘human prehistory’, how could paleontologists have gotten it so wrong? …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham When you hear about fossils, it’s generally within the context of hundreds of thousands or millions of years. Indeed, a recent news article on lab-made fossils began with “fossils are certainly fascinating, but [they] do take rather a long time to form.” It later adds, “over the course of anywhere from tens of thousands to millions of years…the bones [turn] to stone.” But what did the lab-made fossils really demonstrate? They showed it doesn’t take millions of years to form fossils! Scientists were able to make fossils from fresh specimens in just 24 hours—one day! All it [More]

In the U.S. Gulf Coast region, the Upper Jurassic Norphlet Sandstone rests right on top of thousands of feet of Middle Jurassic salt, known as the Louann Salt. Secular geologists believe this sandstone layer was deposited by the windblown accumulation of sand in an arid environment. These kinds of deposits are commonly called aeolian deposits.1 Secular scientists never address or explain exactly how this cl… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Avery Foley If there really was a global flood as described in Genesis, what would we expect to see today? Where are all the fossils of pre-flood humans? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling The visitor overlooks at Bryce Canyon, Utah, provide a breathtaking spectacle of row upon row of towering columns. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Michael J. Oard Sometimes nature gives us a glimpse at the possibilities during the flood. Such a glimpse was provided by a recent ice storm on the mountains of Hawaii. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Catastrophic forces that carved flat vast swathes of the planet defy explanation in conventional geological thinking. …read more Source: <a href=http://creation.com/cypress-hills-planation-surface target=_blank title="Canadian landscape a testimony to the Flood” >creation.com     

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling The Devils Marbles are an iconic landmark in Australia’s Outback. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling Located just outside Moab, Utah, is a wonderland of more than 2,000 natural arches. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Ken Ham Are we living in a new geologic age? Recently, geologists announced a name for the geologic age we live in: the Meghalayan Age. This new age is supposed to have begun 4,250 years ago. In the announcement, geologists also named two other ages, both older. This further divides up earth’s supposed 4.5 billion year history into various lengths of time. These geologists naming these ages are making a critical assumption. They’re assuming millions of years of earth’s history. This newest and most recent age, the Meghalayan Age, is based on oxygen isotopes found in stalagmites in an [More]

Deep time is more gap than rock record …read more Source: creation.com     

Riding the rapids between walls of the Grand Canyon, a rafter supposedly peers up at millions of years. How do scientists arrive at such an old age? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling The Giant’s Causeway is Northern Ireland’s most iconic landmark. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

For decades, creation scientists have debated the level at which the Flood ended in the rock record. In the past, many have based their conclusions on a cursory examination of the rocks, or concentrated only on the strata across the American West. Most agree that the Flood/post-Flood boundary is at one of two levels: 1) at the top of the Cretaceous system, known as the K-Pg (K-T) horizon,1,2 or 2) at or nea… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Bill Worraker The Genesis Flood produced drastic geological changes involving extremely energetic processes which also generated an enormous heat load. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

For many decades, creation scientists have included the Sixtymile Formation in Grand Canyon as part of the Sauk Megasequence that marks the onset of the global Flood.1 They based their conclusions on empirical data contained within the rock unit itself. And now, the secular geological community has arrived at a similar conclusion.2 Stopping short of admitting the possibility of a global Flood, Ka… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Secular scientists have a difficult time explaining an Ice Age, even though there is strong geological evidence that one occurred. In fact, creation scientists have long argued that the Genesis Flood is a vastly superior mechanism for explaining an Ice Age.1 Creation scientists have long argued that t… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Why calculations that undergird the uniformitarian explanation for ice ages are faulty. …read more Source: creation.com     

How mineral-rich oceans hold clues to the age of the earth. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Dr. Terry Mortenson Did the Flood really happen? Or is it a myth? Was it global? Or was it a local flood described in hyperbole? Was it a peaceful flood? And does it matter anyway? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

A misleading museum display seems to want to exclude the truth of Genesis ‘by definition’. …read more Source: creation.com     

Did the Surprise Canyon Formation in Grand Canyon have to form slowly by normal river erosion? …read more Source: creation.com