“We are watching evolution as it’s unfolding,” said an evolutionist at New York University. She was referring to “The Puerto Rican crested anole, a brown lizard with a bright orange throat fan [that] has sprouted special scales to better cling to smooth surfaces like walls and windows and grown larger limbs to sprint across open areas…”1 Research published in the Proceedin… More… …read more Source: icr.org
Bats are programmed with a fixed speed of sound. Changing the air composition messes up their echolocation system, which means they will miss their target. …read more Source: creation.com
By Ken Ham One of the most popular “evidences” for evolution is what’s called homology. Homology refers to similar structures and features across different species (from a creationist perspective this would be across different “kinds”). For example, there’s the textbook example of the vertebrate forearm. Such homology is observable, but here’s where the evolutionary assumptions come into play: they assume this is evidence for evolution because, in their view, similarities in design mean common ancestry. According to a recent article, this common ancestry is a proven fact because “we can still see…5 traces of ancestor species in all human bodies
[More]
Examining creationist arguments about the relationship between birds and dinosaurs …read more Source: AIG Daily
There are a host of scientific problems with evolution. One egregious difficulty is an untestable proposition that people (and primates) evolved from an unknown common ancestor from an unknown time ago. As one evolutionist said, “When you look at the narrative for hominin [bipedal apes, including modern humans] origins, it’s just a big mess—there’s no consensus whatsoever.”1 In addition, t… More… …read more Source: icr.org
By Ken Ham Last week we reran Or, if you want a much more in-depth, technical look at this question, consider the brand-new resource Chimps and Humans: A Geneticist Discovers DNA Evidence That Challenges Evolution by Dr. Jeffrey P. Tomkins. Dr. Tomkins has a background in the fields of genetics and genomics, and in his book, he analyzes the data and discovers that secular scientists consistently tailor their research to fit the evolutionary narrative. He presents his own research demonstrating that instead of a 98–99% similarity, human-chimp genome matches are closer to 80%—results that secular scientists are beginning to echo.
[More]
Life from non-life? Are naturalistic scientists any closer to solving this conundrum? …read more Source: creation.com
By Ken Ham A recent article claims that by mimicking “cosmic evolution” in the lab, researchers have created some of the building blocks of life. But what’s really going on here? …read more Source: AIG Daily
By Dr. Georgia Purdom We often see the statistic that human and chimp DNA is 98–99% similar. But is that true? …read more Source: AIG Daily
In ‘darkest Africa’, a shy forest-dwelling large four-footed creature with zebra stripes, and a ‘unicorn’? What could it be? …read more Source: creation.com
Complex operations within a cell have to be present from the start for it to function at all. …read more Source: creation.com
Is there a one-to-one correspondence between created ‘kinds’ and the ‘kinds’ on board Noah’s Ark? …read more Source: creation.com
The octopus is one of the most amazing animals in God’s creation.1 Now, A new paper in Genome Biology and Evolution indicates that a type of octopus appears to have evolved independently to develop something resembling a shell, despite having lost the genetic code that produced actual shells in its ancestors and relatives.2 (Emphasis… More… …read more Source: icr.org
A big question about the most complex structure in the universe …read more Source: creation.com
Have scientists proven human evolution from a “common apelike ancestor,” or are we being told a clever, confusing story filled with farcical “facts?” What is chromosome fusion, and why does it matter when discussing matters of the Christian faith? In the second installment of this two-part episode, ICR geneticist Dr. Jeff Tomkins and host Trey Bowling dig deeper into the science and expose the flaws of an anti-design approach to genetics.
Back in the nineteenth century, Charles Darwin promoted the supposed similarity between humans and chimpanzees. Later DNA studies seemed to support that idea—until someone started taking a closer look and noticed that there had been some…monkey business. In the first installment of this two-part episode, ICR geneticist Dr. Jeff Tomkins and host Trey Bowling discuss how chimp and human DNA are not as similar as many people think, and why it matters.
By Melissa Webb Some creatures produce tenaciously sticky substances and researchers hope to mimic these materials to create safer surgical procedures. …read more Source: AIG Daily
Mars is a lifeless world. But those holding to a naturalistic worldview continue to have hope—even faith—that the Red Planet was at one time thriving with life. Such a conviction is based on the strange hypothesis that organic life can spring spontaneously from inorganic non-life. This theory is called spontaneous abiogenesis.1 Here on Earth, evolutionists are still at square one in their vain attempt2… More… …read more Source: icr.org
By Ken Ham According to a recent article, some researchers now believe that aging is a reversible process (in mice it is, at least; human studies have not yet been done). …read more Source: AIG Daily
Color patterns in animals, whether vertebrates or invertebrates, are designed by the Creator for camouflage, warning, courtship, or, simply, for the aesthetic value. Evolutionists have recently conducted investigation of anuran color patterns, “A team of researchers from NYU Abu Dhabi (NYUAD) has discovered new insights into the evolution of color patterns in frogs and toads—collectively known as anurans.”1… More… …read more Source: icr.org
Seahorses are as baffling to the theory of evolution as are duck-billed platypuses. The unusual, extraordinary seahorse cries out for a creative Creator Who cannot be contained in the naturalistic box of evolution. Join Eric Lyons as he looks at this wonder of Creation. Watch: Wonders of Creation: Seahorses – Apologetics Press
By Dr. Gordon Wilson This agile flyer scoots in and out of tight spots faster than any plane Boeing or Airbus ever dreamed of. …read more Source: AIG Daily
Science is dynamic. What was considered incontrovertible for decades can be overturned with a simple discovery or more research. So it is with the never-ending problems with bird evolution. As creationists, we understand birds were created as birds thousands of years ago on Day 5 of the creation week. A majority of evolutionists, however, posit birds somehow evolved from bony-tailed theropod dinosaurs. The prestigious … More… …read more Source: icr.org
What sort of ecological interactions would have taken place in the pre-Fall world? …read more Source: creation.com
An assessment of the claims of human evolution. …read more Source: creation.com
Drops explode off superhydrophobic gecko skin, and its microstructure also kills bacteria, a structure which could save human lives …read more Source: creation.com
The passage of time hasn’t solved a major riddle of plant evolution. …read more Source: creation.com