Peacock feathers make Darwin sick
How did the peacock get such a spectacular tail? Bothered by this question, Charles Darwin wrote: 'The sight of a feather in a peacock's tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me sick!'
Some time later, though, Darwin proposed his 'theory of sexual selection' which basically says that the peacock evolved its exotic tail to attract a mate, thus helping it produce more offspring and thus increasing the numbers with attractive tails.
But a recent critical review, published in the prestigious journal Science, has pointed out that the theory has 'fatal problems' and 'needs to be replaced'.
However, other evolutionary scientists have rushed to Darwin's defense; contending that the authors 'fail to provide...a genuine alternative theory'.
But what if there is no evolutionary explanation? Perhaps the peacock tail continually evades an evolutionary explanation because it didn't evolve, but was designed, after all.
Related Articles:
Peacock Poppycock http://creation.com/peacock-poppycock
The peacock's tail and sexual selection http://creation.com/the-beauty-of-the-peacock-tail-and-the-problems-with-the-theory-of-sexual-selection
Peacock Tail Tale Failure http://creation.com/peacock-tail-tale-failure
Related Products:
Creation Magazine http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=90-3-003
Creation Answers Book http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-505
If Animals Could Talk Book http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-088
How did the peacock get such a spectacular tail? Bothered by this question, Charles Darwin wrote: ‘The sight of a feather in a peacock’s tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me sick!’
Some time later, though, Darwin proposed his ‘theory of sexual selection’ which basically says that the peacock evolved its exotic tail to attract a mate, thus helping it produce more offspring and thus increasing the numbers with attractive tails.
But a recent critical review, published in the prestigious journal Science, has pointed out that the theory has ‘fatal problems’ and ‘needs to be replaced’.
However, other evolutionary scientists have rushed to Darwin’s defense; contending that the authors ‘fail to provide…a genuine alternative theory’.
But what if there is no evolutionary explanation? Perhaps the peacock tail continually evades an evolutionary explanation because it didn’t evolve, but was designed, after all.
Related Articles:
Peacock Poppycock http://creation.com/peacock-poppycock
The peacock’s tail and sexual selection http://creation.com/the-beauty-of-the-peacock-tail-and-the-problems-with-the-theory-of-sexual-selection
Peacock Tail Tale Failure http://creation.com/peacock-tail-tale-failure
Related Products:
Creation Magazine http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=90-3-003
Creation Answers Book http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-505
If Animals Could Talk Book http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-088
Thanks! Share it with your friends!
Tweet
Share
Pin It
LinkedIn
Google+
Reddit
Tumblr