My latest survey shatters all of the myths that the CDC has used to ignore the VAERS safety data. There are more reports for these vaccines because there are more events observed.
Executive summary
Read More: Myth busted: VAERS is NOT “overreported”
My latest survey shatters all of the myths that the CDC has used to ignore the VAERS safety data. There are more reports for these vaccines because there are more events observed.
Executive summary
There are only three possible reasons that the adverse events reported in VAERS are so high for the COVID vaccines:
- Fraud
- Overreporting
- The vaccines are unsafe.
Nobody argues for #1 because there is no evidence to support that.
The CDC and FDA argue, without any evidence, that the sole reason is #2.
This is unlikely since the “overreporting” was happening worldwide in every adverse event reporting system and it all began at the same time as the vaccine rollout.
In this article, I bust the “overreporting” myth by using data that took me only a few hours to collect. What I found is that it isn’t even a close call: VAERS is actually underreported for the COVID vaccines (relative to other vaccines) and there are more reports because the vaccines are extremely unsafe (reason #3).
For the COVID vaccines, the CDC has had nearly two years to collect the data that I collected in just 2 hours. For Gardasil, they’ve had 16 years to collect the data.
What I found from my survey of over 250 healthcare workers was that:
Read More: Myth busted: VAERS is NOT “overreported”
Thanks! Share it with your friends!
Tweet
Share
Pin It
LinkedIn
Google+
Reddit
Tumblr