Proof The Bible Is True

As the World Health Organization (WHO) prepares to convene its annual World Health Assembly May 21-30, controversy continues to swirl over two proposed instruments on the agenda: the pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).

 

Much of the criticism levied against both instruments pertains to how they may threaten national sovereignty.

 

But experts told The Defender the proposals also threaten personal medical sovereignty, including the doctor-patient relationship, medical freedom and personal autonomy.

 

“These instruments would inject themselves and interrupt the doctor-patient relationship,” said attorney Reggie Littlejohn. “The WHO will be saying what treatments are the ‘correct’ ones and what treatments are the ‘incorrect’ ones, and that … is an abrogation of sovereignty.”

 

Read More: Exclusive: WHO Proposals Threaten Doctor-Patient Relationship, Personal Autonomy • Children’s Health Defense