Proof The Bible Is True

Fast-forming canyons show that textbook pictures of slow and gradual processes are really just storytelling. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

An American research team recently reanalyzed a strange fossil the Works Progress Administration excavated in 1940 from the Triassic Otis Chalk in west Texas. This partial skull showed that the animal had a huge, thick dome on its head, much like pachycephalosaurs found in Cretaceous deposits. According to conventional consensus, 100 million years and a vicious extinction event separate the two fossil types. What role did an evolutionary perspective play in this team’s conclusions about this supposedly out-of-place dome-headed fossil? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

Do these controversial finds provide a good argument against deep time? …read more Read more here: creation.com     

These huge creatures are used for evolutionary propaganda, but they can best be explained from a biblical worldview. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

By Jake Hebert Despite its popularity, the Milankovitch hypothesis has many problems that are acknowledged even by secular scientists (Cronin 2010, 130–139). …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Recent ICR research has yielded convincing evidence that the results of an iconic climate/paleoclimate paper have been largely invalid—even by secular scientists’ own reckoning—for the last 25 years. Moreover, most climate and paleoclimate scientists seem to be completely unaware of this fact. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

By Tim Chaffey In the Josh Rosenau’s zeal to disparage the Ark Encounter, he made numerous blatant errors that reveal his extreme bias. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Don DeYoung People often refer to rock layers as though the earth is made of solid rock, impervious to water. Thankfully, this isn’t true. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling “Lack of oxygen did not hold back evolution of complex life” was the bold announcement in the scientific news media recently. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Reasons why it is not Noah’s Flood …read more Read more here: creation.com     

Fulgurites are fossilized lightning strikes. Physicist Don DeYoung wrote that after 4.6 billion years, at the current lightning-strike rate, every square meter of land should contain far more fossilized lightning strikes than it can even hold. New fulgurite research updates the numbers to bring this fulgurite problem into sharper focus. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

There was a time when one of the world’s coldest and iciest regions was much warmer. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

Scientists found DNA in sediment drill cores from the Bering Sea, hundreds of meters beneath the seafloor surface. Secular scientists insist that sediments at that depth required at least hundreds of thousands of years to deposit. Given that DNA degrades relatively quickly, the team faced the challenge of explaining how DNA could persist long enough to get buried beneath that much sediment. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

In trying to determine the boundary between Flood and post-Flood deposits, help may come from an unexpected and slithery source. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

Most people are familiar with the concept of an ice age, a time when glaciers covered much of the earth’s land surface. Secular scientists believe there were at least five major ice ages in earth history that happened over millions of years. But a straightforward reading of the Bible indicates a young age for the earth—about 6,000 years. How should Christians respond to claims that ice age evidence proves an old earth? Do the scientific data really support multiple ice ages over long time periods? And how does this fit into biblical history? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org [More]

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling Dr. Snelling documents the methodology and history of determining present decay constants and half-lives of parent radioisotopes used for dating methods. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Just like the subject matter under investigation, opinions shift about in regards to plate tectonics. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

When the claims that the Denisovan fossils represent a “new kind” of human are put under scrutiny, a different picture emerges. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

Radiometric dating methods often give wrong dates for rocks. Some critics argue that creationists shouldn’t point this out, because the methods should not have been used in the first place. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling Diamonds are dazzling but definitely not “forever.” In fact, they wouldn’t exist without special conditions that God provided. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

ICR often receives passionate social-media feedback on our articles and news posts. For example, we recently reported the discovery of organic protein remains in fossils.1 Although the secular scientists themselves described these remains as original animal tissue (i.e., unmineralized), one of our readers responded: “They never found soft tissue. They found preserved soft tissue. It was mineralized and not organic.” His words sound familiar. Almost without fail, whenever an ICR scientist discusses original tissue in fossils, we hear well-intended explanations of how we got it all wrong—that the fossils in question are actually made of minerals. But they are not [More]

Even secular scientists can’t agree on what age to assign one of the world’s most magnificent geological features. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

By Change Tan This paper argues that the issue with the origin of life and the origin of biodiversity is not an issue of time, though deep time is problematical. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

In August of 2009, the Institute for Creation Research reported that UK paleontologists found intact ink sacs within squid fossils.1 The ink appeared largely unaltered, and the scientists used it to draw a picture of how the extinct squid variety would have appeared in real life. Now, a new team of researchers, publishing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, reports that the ink is almost an exact match with modern cuttlefish ink. The age implications of this find are clearer now than ever. These researchers subjected the fossil squid ink from two samples to eight different tests [More]

By Dr. Andrew A. Snelling At today’s rate of ocean-floor buildup, chalk layers would take millions of years to form. How do creationists explain them? …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Geologists struggle to explain how features such as mountain ranges and plains formed by a slow-and-gradual process and ignore evidences that point to a global flood. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

How the cataclysm of Noah’s Flood explains it. …read more Read more here: creation.com