Proof The Bible Is True

The origin of snake venom has long been a mystery to both creationists and evolutionists. However, by stepping outside the standard research paradigm, scientists recently showed that snake venom proteins may have arisen from existing salivary proteins, supporting the idea that they arose post-Fall through modification of existing features. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

It’s not a caterpillar. Nor an earthworm-its ‘legs’ have retractable feet and hooked claws. And it most certainly is not a ‘missing link’. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

What do porous dinosaur eggs laid on flat bedding planes mean? …read more Read more here: creation.com     

Authentic speciation is a process whereby organisms diversify within the boundaries of their gene pools, and this can result in variants with specific ecological adaptability. While it was once thought that this process was strictly facilitated by DNA sequence variability, Darwin’s classic example of speciation in finches now includes a surprisingly strong epigenetic component as well. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

The case for Neandertals as more primitive members of an evolutionary continuum that spans from apes to modern man continues to weaken. Genetic and archaeological finds are completely reshaping modern concepts of Neandertal men and women. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

The “superorganism” that you are testifies to the superlative wisdom of our Creator God. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Zonkeys attest to the variations possible within the “horse kind.” …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

An octopus can change the color of its skin at will to mimic any kind of surrounding. It actively camouflages itself with astoundingly complicated biological machinery. Wouldn’t it be great if, say, a soldier’s uniform or an armored vehicle used similar technology? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

Secular scientists claimed in the 1970s that chimp genomes are 98% similar to humans, and it was apparently verified by more modern techniques. But that estimate actually used isolated segments of DNA that we already share with chimps—not the whole genomes. The latest comparison that included all of the two species’ DNA revealed a huge difference from the percentage scientists have been claiming for years. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

A new peer-reviewed scientific study challenges a common argument for the Darwinian theory of evolution by showing that so-called “redundant” units in the human genome actually have highly specialized functions. Casey Luskin, an attorney with graduate degrees in both science and law, explained in a report published at Evolution News and Views that evolutionists have generally assumed that synonymous codons – a sequence of three consecutive nucleotides that is part of the genetic code – are functionally equivalent. A nucleotide is the basic building block of nucleic acids. Luskin is research coordinator for the Center for Science and Culture at [More]

What are ‘ring species’, and are they a legitimate argument for ‘proof of change of kinds’, as some evolutionists claim? …read more Read more here: creation.com     

In the twilight zone, bright sharks know how to hide in the light. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Not poor design! …read more Read more here: creation.com     

The evolutionists’ cry that ostracod gametes are 17 million years old defies common sense. … However, that isn’t the only challenge for the evolutionary paradigm. The supposedly millions-of-years-old ostracod fossils that Archer and his team examined from the famous Riversleigh fossil deposits in Queensland, Australia, were beautifully preserved, to the point of “three-dimensional subcellular preservation”.2 That’s what enabled the researchers to study the gametes and internal reproductive organs in great detail.  “Nobody has ever seen sperm fossilised like this before,” said Professor Archer. “We get used to fossil bones and teeth but we did not expect the soft tissues would also [More]

Lenski’s long-term evolution experiment does not distinguish between observable limited change and unobservable molecules-to-man evolution. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Good designs last, evolutionists conclude, but where did they come from in the first place? …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

In an everyday scene so bizarre that science fiction writers might never have imagined it, algae-eating sea slugs actually hijack chloroplasts—those tiny plant structures that perform photosynthesis—and use them as energy producers for themselves. Evolutionists have been trying to explain this complicated and baffling process. Have they? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

Published: 11 November 2009 A salamander allegedly “18 million years old” is the latest fossil to produce astonishingly well preserved soft tissue. This time, it’s muscle tissue, and it is supposedly the most pristine example yet. M. H. Schweitzer The muscle and blood found in the salamander fossil are the latest soft-tissue evidence in a long line of similar discoveries. Earlier, these flexible branching structures in T. rex bone (left photo) have justifiably been identified as blood vessels, while microscopic structures squeezed out of the blood vessels (right photo) look distinctly like cells, as evolutionary researchers themselves have admitted. (See [More]

Many dinosaur fossils include real bone—they are not completely mineralized, i.e. are not yet ‘rock’. And what is found inside those dinosaur bones is a huge surprise to many people. A series of discoveries since the early 1990s has revealed dino bones with blood cells, hemoglobin, fragile proteins, and soft tissue such as flexible ligaments and blood vessels. And of special note: DNA and radiocarbon. This is enormously confronting for evolutionists, because how could such bones possibly be 65 million years old? As one of the researchers involved in the discovery of dinosaur blood cells, Dr Mary Schweitzer, said: Why [More]

Numerous fossil remains ‘dated’ as being many millions of years old are hardly mineralized (i.e. where minerals take the place of the creature’s original tissue), if at all. For example, Tyrannosaurus rex bones containing red blood cells and soft ‘squishy’ tissue boggle the minds of those who claim that dinosaur remains are 65 million years old, at least.1 Such soft tissue finds utterly contradict the widely believed old age of the earth.2 And now, a new find exceeds all previous claims for persistence of the remains of dead creatures to the present day—that is, according to the mind-stretchingly bizarre pre-Cambrian [More]

A pterosaur fossilized-in its egg! What would you think? …read more Read more here: creation.com     

  There are many strange creatures living in the sea, but few stranger than the Nudibranch Sea Slug. And there are few whose design is more damaging to the theory of evolution. Sea slugs mainly eat sea anemones, which are covered with stinging cells that normally burst at the slightest touch, firing poison darts at the creature which touched them. The sea slug, however, is able to tear sea anemones apart and swallow the stinging cells without bursting them! Wikipedia.org, Nick Hobgood Nudibranchs (Nembrotha kubaryana) eating clavelina tunicatecolonies. Even more amazing is what happens to the stinging cells when they reach the [More]

While bats live in air and dolphins live in water, both use a biological form of sonar technology called echolocation to see with sound! The specifications in dolphin and bat biosonar systems are so many, so well-integrated, and so precise, could they really have developed at random in two completely different environments? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

Who has ever heard of a fossilized brain? Few would expect such a discovery, yet it looks like that’s what researchers found inside a Stone Age skull from Norway. If so, it would confirm a published creation prediction and challenge many evolutionary timescales. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

Is there an evolutionary advantage to having a mode of swimming like this? …read more Read more here: creation.com     

Agents of the ‘Black Death’, these much-despised rodents very clearly did not have a non-rodent ancestor. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

These uniquely designed creatures continue to defy evolutionary explanation … …read more Read more here: creation.com