Proof The Bible Is True

By Dr. Don DeYoung Ant behavior may help us save lives. Creation is overflowing with such practical ideas and possible solutions to our most vexing problems. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Evolutionists are divided over whether the kiwi-a unique bird found only in New Zealand-was ever able to fly. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

By Ken Ham Recently, Business Insider published a short video on its website called “How scientists discovered an ancient fish that went extinct 65 million years ago.” Now, this story is an old one—the fish was discovered in the 1930s. But it was the find of the century at the time and is still an amazing discovery today. The fish is known as the coelacanth (SEE-la-canth). It has thick scales and lobed fins, and it appears throughout the fossil record in rock layers that are typically dated from around 340 million years until its last appearance in rock layers laid [More]

By Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell Carbon residue preserved in zircon dated 4.1 billion years old does not reveal life’s evolution or the time of life’s beginning. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

How long would inanimate chemicals take to swirl themselves together and form a living cell? This unfair question assumes that such chemicals could ever form themselves into a cell even given an eternity to do so, but recent evidence from tiny crystals in Australian rocks causes researchers to think life evolved much earlier than most scientists would ever have thought possible. However, this new story of early emerging life comes with an array of new challenges. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

By Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell Spiders were designed with two versions of the dachshund gene, one essential to knee formation, but spider knees did not evolve through gene duplication. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

When someone says “ribs,” people immediately think of those organ-protecting bones that wrap around a thorax. Well, cervical ribs are different, and cervical ribs on extinct long-necked dinosaurs were very different. They ran the whole length of certain sauropods’ necks. Each rib attached to a neck vertebra, and each rib stretched across the length of three total vertebrae. Were these cervical ribs an evolutionary happenstance, or did they serve some kind of function as though created on purpose? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

By Change Laura Tan How are all life forms connected? Are they linked by one giant family tree, a web, or a forest of family trees? …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Researchers in Trinidad relocated guppies (Poecilia reticulata) from a waterfall pool teeming with predators to previously guppy-free pools above the falls where there was only one known possible predator (of small guppies only, therefore large guppies would be safe).1 The descendants of the transplanted guppies adjusted to their new circumstances by growing bigger, maturing later, and having fewer and bigger offspring. The speed of these changes bewildered evolutionists, because their standard millions-of-years view is that the guppies would require long periods of time to adapt. One evolutionist said, ‘The guppies adapted to their new environment in a mere four years—a [More]

By Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell That God created teeth, scales, and enamel at the same time is not an answer to evolutionists, so they claim each enameled fish fossil clarifies the confusion. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

At the 75th annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, held this year in downtown Dallas, the world’s foremost fossil experts presented scores of research summaries. Amazingly, almost all of these fossil descriptions included phylogenetic (evolutionary) tree diagrams. Today’s paleontologists show a religious-like devotion to fit their finds in an evolutionary tree. And with equally amazing regularity they describe problems with this process of constructing evolutionary trees. Are these problems significant enough to cast doubt on the whole exercise? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

By Jeffrey P. Tomkins Interestingly, BioLogos is probably the only evolutionary group that puts such a high level of focus on this hypothesis as key evidence for evolution. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Alan Gillen Is Community-associated (CA)-MRSA “evolution in action”? Microbiology research based on creation provides some answers to its emerging dominance in the USA. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

By Dr. David Menton A bird’s-eye view involves much more than the panoramic view we see from an airplane. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Does saying that God designed creatures mean that they’re nothing more than mere machines? Despite protestations from prominent evolutionists, teleology (purpose) is central to understanding biology. But does this mean that organisms were designed by some external agent? There are evolutionists who agree that life is full of purpose, but that purpose comes from the very fabric of the universe itself, so that there’s no need for an external designer. Eugene Y. from Malaysia writes: Read More: Biology purpose and pantheism – creation.com

By Ken Ham Sometimes I see things in the news that just make me shake my head. I’m often reminded of this verse about those who ignore God’s clear witness in creation: “Professing to be wise, they became fools” (Romans 1:22). Well, I was most recently reminded of this in relation to an article titled, “Fossil could settle the debate over whether early birds really did fly.” This article is reporting on a study published in Scientific Reports that showed that supposed “early” birds flew just like modern ones. Wow! Now that’s a revelation! This study revolved around part of [More]

By Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell An ape that can learn to walk on its hind legs or has some similarities to humans does not demonstrate that it is an evolutionary cousin of human beings. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

David Attenborough fails in his attempt to refute the Genesis account of creation with his account of the Darwinian tree of life. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

Darwinists hold up gene duplication as evidence for ‘goo-to-you’ evolutionary change but the reality is much different. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

By Dr. Alan Gillen We have seen a changing profile from HA-MRSA to CA-MRSA. This is potentially dangerous because the new strains are more virulent and aggressive. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell The Open Tree of Life represents a rejection of our Creator’s account of our origins in favor of man’s unverifiable belief that random processes produced life. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

By Dr. John Whitmore How is it possible to get such thick ocean reefs, if they had only a few thousand years to grow, after the Flood? …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

Archer fish exploits two independent hydrodynamic properties to shoot down prey with powerful water jet. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

A short protein, or peptide, in wasp toxin may one day treat human cancer in a whole new way. Researchers isolated a particular peptide from the venom of Brazilian Polybia paulista wasps and studied how it seeks and destroys cancer cells while leaving normal cells unharmed. They uncovered intriguing details that enable this average-looking peptide to become a cell-destroying weapon. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org     

By Jeffrey P. Tomkins Past evolutionary research in comparative DNA analysis between chimps and humans has employed a great deal of preferential and selective data analysis. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily     

The way in which a cow turns sunshine, water and grass into milk defies evolutionary explanations. …read more Read more here: creation.com     

In 1994 the prestigious journal Science shocked the scientific world by publishing sequence data from DNA retrieved from dinosaur bone said to be 80 million years old. DNA is a fragile molecule, and so it breaks down quickly. Measurements of DNA stability suggest it could last thousands of years, at best, under the likely conditions. But 80 million years was just too incredible for other skeptical scientists. Eventually, these skeptics were vindicated—as it became apparent that the original researchers had sequenced contaminating human DNA, not dinosaur DNA. However, in 2012 a different group of researchers published new results supporting the [More]