Proof The Bible Is True

Biologists have long noted that unlike most animals, humans have sclera—that white ring around the iris. In the ICR video Adam or Apes, I tried to explain that humans discern many unspoken messages just through interpreting our uniquely human eyes. For example, eye contact informs the degree of engagement, and eye direction—such as an eye roll—can express exasperation or guilt. Critics of our video countered that … More… …read more Source: icr.org     

A data storage and processing system with multiple overlapping codes-how did it come to be? …read more Source: creation.com     

Although plants are not alive in the biblical sense,1 scientists continue to discover just how complex they are.2 It has been known for decades that plants have been designed with a fascinating immune system,3 but many questions still remain. Recently, another mystery has been solved: why pathogens cannot ordinarily enter the water pores, called hydathodes, of the leaves. Viewing the le… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Ken Ham Have you ever heard the claim that evolution can go backward? “Regressive evolution,” “reverse evolution,” or “devolution” refers to the loss of complex features and functions, as opposed to the supposed gain of features and functions (which has never been observed). Now, are blind cave fish an example of this supposed “regressive evolution”? Well, that’s the claim according to a news report on a new species of cave fish belonging to the genus Sinocyclocheilus recently discovered in a dining table-size pool in a Chinese cave. This new fish species has been described as “unicorn-like,” due to a [More]

The humble fingernail turns out to have intricate design. The middle layer has fibres aligned to prevent tearing down to the nail beds, and the two outer layers make nails as strong as hooves. …read more Source: creation.com     

Responding to vexatious evolutionist challenges about genetic information. …read more Source: creation.com     

“We are watching evolution as it’s unfolding,” said an evolutionist at New York University. She was referring to “The Puerto Rican crested anole, a brown lizard with a bright orange throat fan [that] has sprouted special scales to better cling to smooth surfaces like walls and windows and grown larger limbs to sprint across open areas…”1 Research published in the Proceedin… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Bats are programmed with a fixed speed of sound. Changing the air composition messes up their echolocation system, which means they will miss their target. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham One of the most popular “evidences” for evolution is what’s called homology. Homology refers to similar structures and features across different species (from a creationist perspective this would be across different “kinds”). For example, there’s the textbook example of the vertebrate forearm. Such homology is observable, but here’s where the evolutionary assumptions come into play: they assume this is evidence for evolution because, in their view, similarities in design mean common ancestry. According to a recent article, this common ancestry is a proven fact because “we can still see…5 traces of ancestor species in all human bodies [More]

Examining creationist arguments about the relationship between birds and dinosaurs …read more Source: AIG Daily     

There are a host of scientific problems with evolution. One egregious difficulty is an untestable proposition that people (and primates) evolved from an unknown common ancestor from an unknown time ago. As one evolutionist said, “When you look at the narrative for hominin [bipedal apes, including modern humans] origins, it’s just a big mess—there’s no consensus whatsoever.”1 In addition, t… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Ken Ham Last week we reran Or, if you want a much more in-depth, technical look at this question, consider the brand-new resource Chimps and Humans: A Geneticist Discovers DNA Evidence That Challenges Evolution by Dr. Jeffrey P. Tomkins. Dr. Tomkins has a background in the fields of genetics and genomics, and in his book, he analyzes the data and discovers that secular scientists consistently tailor their research to fit the evolutionary narrative. He presents his own research demonstrating that instead of a 98–99% similarity, human-chimp genome matches are closer to 80%—results that secular scientists are beginning to echo. [More]

Life from non-life? Are naturalistic scientists any closer to solving this conundrum? …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham A recent article claims that by mimicking “cosmic evolution” in the lab, researchers have created some of the building blocks of life. But what’s really going on here? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Georgia Purdom We often see the statistic that human and chimp DNA is 98–99% similar. But is that true? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

In ‘darkest Africa’, a shy forest-dwelling large four-footed creature with zebra stripes, and a ‘unicorn’? What could it be? …read more Source: creation.com     

Complex operations within a cell have to be present from the start for it to function at all. …read more Source: creation.com     

Is there a one-to-one correspondence between created ‘kinds’ and the ‘kinds’ on board Noah’s Ark? …read more Source: creation.com     

The octopus is one of the most amazing animals in God’s creation.1 Now, A new paper in Genome Biology and Evolution indicates that a type of octopus appears to have evolved independently to develop something resembling a shell, despite having lost the genetic code that produced actual shells in its ancestors and relatives.2 (Emphasis… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

A big question about the most complex structure in the universe …read more Source: creation.com     

Have scientists proven human evolution from a “common apelike ancestor,” or are we being told a clever, confusing story filled with farcical “facts?” What is chromosome fusion, and why does it matter when discussing matters of the Christian faith? In the second installment of this two-part episode, ICR geneticist Dr. Jeff Tomkins and host Trey Bowling dig deeper into the science and expose the flaws of an anti-design approach to genetics.

Back in the nineteenth century, Charles Darwin promoted the supposed similarity between humans and chimpanzees. Later DNA studies seemed to support that idea—until someone started taking a closer look and noticed that there had been some…monkey business. In the first installment of this two-part episode, ICR geneticist Dr. Jeff Tomkins and host Trey Bowling discuss how chimp and human DNA are not as similar as many people think, and why it matters.

By Melissa Webb Some creatures produce tenaciously sticky substances and researchers hope to mimic these materials to create safer surgical procedures. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Mars is a lifeless world. But those holding to a naturalistic worldview continue to have hope—even faith—that the Red Planet was at one time thriving with life. Such a conviction is based on the strange hypothesis that organic life can spring spontaneously from inorganic non-life. This theory is called spontaneous abiogenesis.1 Here on Earth, evolutionists are still at square one in their vain attempt2… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Ken Ham According to a recent article, some researchers now believe that aging is a reversible process (in mice it is, at least; human studies have not yet been done). …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Color patterns in animals, whether vertebrates or invertebrates, are designed by the Creator for camouflage, warning, courtship, or, simply, for the aesthetic value. Evolutionists have recently conducted investigation of anuran color patterns, “A team of researchers from NYU Abu Dhabi (NYUAD) has discovered new insights into the evolution of color patterns in frogs and toads—collectively known as anurans.”1… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Seahorses are as baffling to the theory of evolution as are duck-billed platypuses. The unusual, extraordinary seahorse cries out for a creative Creator Who cannot be contained in the naturalistic box of evolution. Join Eric Lyons as he looks at this wonder of Creation.   Watch: Wonders of Creation: Seahorses – Apologetics Press