For two centuries Newtonian physics had successes unparalleled in the history of science. Failures in Newtonian physics led to the modern physics of the 20th century. Read more here: AIG Daily
Creation in-depth: The case against expansion. Read more here: creation.com
According to the First Law of Thermodynamics, nothing in the Universe (i.e., matter or energy) can pop into existence from nothing (see Miller, 2013). All of the scientific evidence points to that conclusion. So, the Universe could not have popped into existence before the alleged “big bang” (an event which we do not endorse). Therefore, God must have created the Universe. One of the popular rebuttals by the atheistic community is that quantum mechanics could have created the Universe. In 1905, Albert Einstein proposed the idea of mass-energy equivalence, resulting in the famous equation, E = mc2 (1905). We now
[More]
Creation in-depth: The case for time dilation Read more here: creation.com
The red shift effect Halton Arp. Wikimedia: Alissaarp by Bill Worraker & Andrew C. McIntosh A review of: Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies by Halton Arp Interstellar Media, Cambridge University Press, 1987 Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science by Halton Arp Apeiron, Montreal, 1999 In these two books, Halton Arp elaborates his contention that since 1966, observations have been accumulating which contradict the generally accepted big bang cosmology. The key issue is the interpretation of redshift, the fractional increase in the wavelengths of lines in an astronomical spectrum when compared with laboratory wavelengths. Arp puts together a substantial body
[More]
How should we approach the distant starlight travel time issue? How do we argue against day-age theory? Read more here: creation.com
Dr. Danny Faulkner, AiG–U.S., explains whether astronomers can see the surfaces of stars and what methods they use. Read more here: AIG Daily
On March 21, 2013, the European Space Agency (ESA) published a new image of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, generated from data collected by the Planck space telescope. Big Bang cosmologists interpret the CMB to be "left-over" radiation from a time about 380,000 years after the alleged Big Bang.1 These are the highest resolution images of the CMB to date. Read More via The Planck Data and the Big Bang.
Does the existence of a particle called the Higgs boson help solve one of the most fundamental riddles of the universe? More…
Researchers studied some photographs taken by the NASA Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and now think that a former lake was once on the red planet's surface. They believe that the water may have come from underground, which leads them to think that life may still live, and have originated, below the surface. More…
Some cosmologists are interpreting new data from a NASA spacecraft as an “afterglow” of the supposed Big Bang. But is that really what this is? More…
The journal Nature described four “puzzling” solar system bodies that have properties that shouldn't exist if our system is billions of years old. But these features make perfect sense if our solar system is only thousands of years old, just as the Bible states. More…
Listen Now On this episode of ID the Future, Dr. Jay Richards talks with John Lennox about his book God and Stephen Hawking: Whose Design Is It Anyway?. In this book, Prof. Lennox counters Stephen Hawking‘s argument in The Grand Design that “the universe can and will create itself from nothing.” Is philosophy dead, as Hawking claims? Is the so-called M-theory the “only viable candidate” for a complete ‘theory of everything’? Tune in and find out!