Proof The Bible Is True

A scientific study aligns with the biblical account of the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah being destroyed by fire and brimstone from the heavens. The book of Genesis tells the story of God sending two angels to save Lot and his family from a city where men demanded to “be intimate” with visiting men, one of the clearest biblical condemnations of homosexuality. In response, God “rained upon Sodom and Gomorrah sulfurous fire … out of heaven.”   It would be hundreds of years before life returned to the region.   And now scientists have found evidence of a cataclysmic event in that area, [More]

In a universe allegedly billions of years old, some clearly visible star features should not exist. Read More

Secular scientists claim that stars form “naturally” from enormous clouds of gas and dust. The newly-formed star is thought to be encircled by a thin, slowly-spinning disk of dusty material. Dust particles within the disk are thought to collide and stick together, through a hypothetical process called accretion, somehow forming more massive clumps of matter over vast amounts of time. These clumps become the cores of future plane… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner It’s ironic that the very thing that supposedly is the proof of the big bang model may turn out to be its undoing. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

When did stars explode, and how can we see their light under a biblical time frame? Are they compatible with a very good creation? …read more Source: creation.com     

Could solar superflares have made the supposed ‘early’ Earth inhospitable for life? Read More

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner Creationists frequently quote Hubble to the effect that he inserted the cosmological principle to avoid stark realties about the universe that his data implied. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Ron Samec After 29 years of research, a creation astronomer has observable evidence that stars can’t be billions of years old. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Astronomers claim they have found a protoplanet forming around a young star, but not so fast. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Harry F. Sanders, III Dr. Danny Faulkner’s recent Answers Research Journal article makes a number of important points about redshifts, quasars, and an expanding universe. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner Flat-earthers spend considerable time and effort attempting to debunk all things from NASA. In this article, I will take up two of their complaints. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Saturn is too hot for its evolutionary age. It should’ve cooled off if it were 4.5 billion years old. What can we learn about the age of the universe from our solar system? How can biblical creationists confidently assert a young age for celestial objects like blue stars?   Listen: The Institute for Creation Research

Naturalistic assumptions can get in the way of understanding the origin of solar system objects. Read More

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner Sights like a lunar eclipse are possible only because of our moon’s unique relationship to the earth. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Oxford scientists cast doubt on intelligent life outside Earth; Elon Musk says this is all the more reason to colonize space. …read more Source: <a href=http://creation.com/dissolving-fermi-paradox target=_blank title="Dissolving the Fermi Paradox” >creation.com     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner June 30 is International Asteroid Day. It’s an opportunity to talk about asteroids and a good time to discuss a recent item in the news related to asteroids. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

A look at the problems associated with evolutionary origin-of-life scenarios for our world. …read more Source: creation.com     

A team of astronomers recently concluded that a nearby spheroidal galaxy, designated as NGC1052-DF2, contains very little, if any, dark matter.1,2 Since Big Bang scientists use dark matter to explain how galaxies formed, this poses a potential problem for naturalistic views. The galaxy in question, estimated to be about 65 million light-years away, has roughly the same volume as our own Milky Way galaxy, but it&r… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Or is it concluded from the assumption of a big bang? …read more Source: creation.com     

Can causes operate at the same time as their effects? …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham “Our universe may end the same way it was created: with a big, sudden bang.” This is the opening line of a recent article on Business Insider. This article highlighted research from a group of Harvard physicists who claim the universe might end with an “instantaneous bang” in 10139 years (that’s 10 million trillion trillion . . . with a lot more trillions of years after it). Here’s their thinking: they believe the Higgs boson particle, a particle in quantum physics that gives other particles their mass, could become destabilized. This could lead to an explosion of [More]

The exoplanet Kepler-78b stuns astronomers, defies evolutionary formation theories …read more Source:

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner When a probe flew by Pluto, it made a shocking discovery: the surface is young. Astronomers are still scrambling to explain why. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner The discovery of a galaxy with little or no dark matter disproves MOND. Therefore, the reality of dark matter is more certain. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

A recent news article1 reported that certain types of stars2 in our Milky Way Galaxy have more lithium (Li) in their stellar atmosphere than the current models predict. Before 1982, it was generally believed that Li abundances in “unevolved” low-mass stars3 with low metallicity4 were constant as predicted by Big Bang nucleosynthesis models. However, in that year a closer analy… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

Does the moon give us enough clues to estimate how many asteroids impacted the earth. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner The hypothesis that extragalactic redshifts are cosmological is strongly supported. I encourage fellow recent creationists to abandon their doubts that extragalactic redshifts are cosmological and better focus their work on explaining extragalactic redshifts in terms of a biblical cosmology. …read more Source: AIG Daily