Proof The Bible Is True

By Ken Ham A recent article on Forbes.com had a headline that blared, “Earliest Signal Ever: Scientists Find Relic Neutrinos From 1 Second After The Big Bang.” So, is that it now for biblical creation (and a host of secular creation stories offered as alternatives to the big bang)? Have scientists discovered proof that the big bang really happened? Well, not so fast! The headline suggests that some of these relic neutrinos, supposedly from one second after the big bang, have been detected. But with a discerning read through the article, it becomes very clear how many of these “primordial” [More]

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner ET isn’t a mystery, if you’re willing to examine the data from 60 years of research and take it to its logical conclusion. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner Recently there have been press accounts of two new studies related to cosmology. What is new, and what does this mean to creationists? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner Consideration of the first and second laws of thermodynamics leads to the conclusion that the universe’s origin is a metaphysical or spiritual question. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner A recent news story reported on the latest measurement of Saturn’s rotation rate. This is significantly shorter than what is found in most astronomy textbooks. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

On January 21, 2019, during a total lunar eclipse, astronomers and amateur stargazers alike saw a small meteorite strike the lunar surface.1 The collision was seen as a flash of light just before midnight Eastern Time. The darkened surface of the moon during the eclipse made the flash much easier to see. Although scientists have observed and recorded other meteorite strikes on the lunar surface, this is apparently the first time … More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner Flat-earthers often claim that moonlight has a cooling property. I present the results of three independent experiments that test this claim. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

The recent discovery of thirty new exoplanets in other solar systems presents another challenge to the most popular secular theory of planet formation.1,2 These exoplanets are smaller versions of our gas giant Saturn. A recent survey shows that these intermediate gas giants are ten times more common than predicted by the secular theory.3 One of these intermediate gas giants, designated O… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner What do lunar eclipses tell us about flat earth? Lunar eclipses remain the best method for most people to see for themselves that the earth is a sphere. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Saturn’s gravity keeps vacuuming up its own stunning rings. NASA scientists have estimated how fast this process happens. The rings lose six Olympic-sized swimming pools-worth of material every hour according to new results from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.1 For this and other reasons, scientists have concluded that the rings are unlikely to be more than 100 million years old. These rings look young, forcing sc… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

The evolutionary timeline has a problem: Saturn’s icy rings are too ‘pristine’. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner What’s up in 2019? The year begins with a bang, for on the morning of January 1, the moon and Venus will be close together in the sky. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Don DeYoung There have been many attempts to explain the Christmas Star scientifically, and three will be mentioned here. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

When it comes to explaining how our universe came into being, widespread speculation is embraced over hard evidence. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner Flat-earthers argue that since certain verses in Scripture speak of the stars falling, then the stars will literally fall. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

After speaking at a church recently, a young man approached me. I thought he might have a question. Instead, he handed me a 6-page essay he had written. It was a defence of a form of Day-Age creationism, the belief that the days of Genesis were actually long periods of time. Normally, I would not spend too much time on such a thing, but the young man impressed me as humble and studious. He also reminded me of myself at that age, when I was trying to defend that very same position. But when I read his paper, I saw [More]

By Ken Ham A short article appeared recently in an “Ask a Scientist” column in response to the question, “How did the Big Bang begin?” The scientist explains, “The Big Bang Theory is a timeline of the history of the universe. It says nothing about how the universe was created. As such, there is no beginning to the Big Bang, since it is a theory that merely describes the universe’s history.” He goes on to explain that in the Big Bang model (which he wrongly refers to as a theory, as there’s no observational evidence to support it), the entire [More]

A scientific study aligns with the biblical account of the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah being destroyed by fire and brimstone from the heavens. The book of Genesis tells the story of God sending two angels to save Lot and his family from a city where men demanded to “be intimate” with visiting men, one of the clearest biblical condemnations of homosexuality. In response, God “rained upon Sodom and Gomorrah sulfurous fire … out of heaven.”   It would be hundreds of years before life returned to the region.   And now scientists have found evidence of a cataclysmic event in that area, [More]

In a universe allegedly billions of years old, some clearly visible star features should not exist. Read More

Secular scientists claim that stars form “naturally” from enormous clouds of gas and dust. The newly-formed star is thought to be encircled by a thin, slowly-spinning disk of dusty material. Dust particles within the disk are thought to collide and stick together, through a hypothetical process called accretion, somehow forming more massive clumps of matter over vast amounts of time. These clumps become the cores of future plane… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner It’s ironic that the very thing that supposedly is the proof of the big bang model may turn out to be its undoing. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

When did stars explode, and how can we see their light under a biblical time frame? Are they compatible with a very good creation? …read more Source: creation.com     

Could solar superflares have made the supposed ‘early’ Earth inhospitable for life? Read More

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner Creationists frequently quote Hubble to the effect that he inserted the cosmological principle to avoid stark realties about the universe that his data implied. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Dr. Ron Samec After 29 years of research, a creation astronomer has observable evidence that stars can’t be billions of years old. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

Astronomers claim they have found a protoplanet forming around a young star, but not so fast. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Harry F. Sanders, III Dr. Danny Faulkner’s recent Answers Research Journal article makes a number of important points about redshifts, quasars, and an expanding universe. …read more Source: AIG Daily