Nearly two years after the highly-publicized discovery of the elusive ‘God Particle,’ scientists have determined that the current Big Bang model cannot account for the existence of the universe. As previously reported, scientists in Europe announced in 2012 that they had detected the Higgs boson, then confirmed their findings last year. The Higgs boson, also known as “the God particle,” was widely heralded as a key to understanding the origins of the universe. However, in a major setback to the secular Big Bang theory, scientists with King’s College in London announced this month that Higgs boson physics cannot account for
[More]
By Ken Ham On the nationwide Bible Answer Man broadcast on May 27, host Hank Hanegraaff falsely accused me of teaching something I never have and, in fact, have repeatedly stated the exact opposite. Now, some people will ask if I have personally confronted Hank on this serious matter—and yes I did, on the basis of Matthew 18. But we did not resolve the issue, and so my next step is to publicly deal with a very public accusation. You can listen to the section of the May 27 broadcast here (and I transcribed it below): Click here to view
[More]
Use the creation account in John 1:3 to counter Jehovah’s Witnesses denial of Christ’s deity. …read more Read more here: creation.com
A guide to ‘immunizing’ your children-homeschooled or not-against humanism in science. …read more Read more here: creation.com
The information of life is in a state of gradual decay, not upward evolution, according to at least eight technical papers published in the proceedings of a unique symposium called Biological Information: New Perspectives. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org
Pre-human ancestors? …read more Read more here: creation.com
Part one What does it take to make a language? Researchers recently asked this question of the language encoded inside cells. Whatever it takes to make a human language must have happened to make the information-packed language of life, right? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org
Answering questions about the length of time before the Fall and where Adam and Eve will spend eternity. …read more Read more here: creation.com
One of the common objections to biblical creation is that scientists have supposedly demonstrated that the universe is much older than the Bible teaches. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
By Ken Ham A news report Tuesday stated, “Hill is one of hundreds of pastors who signed a petition urging the church to remain unified and respect others’ opinions on homosexuality reports USA Today.” BUT–should we unite around man’s fallible word OR unite around God’s infallible Word? And therein lies the problem, and it’s been the problem since Genesis chapter 3. Sinful man wants unity around man’s fallible word, instead of standing with unity and without compromise on the infallible Word of God. The report also states, Leaders of the United Methodist Church will gather in Florida on Wednesday to
[More]
Cosmos astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson asserts that religious influence on science intellectually cripples would-be innovators. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
By Creation Moments We’ve all heard it said that we are made up of about 98 cents worth of chemicals. However, the living matter that makes up our bodies is very different from non living matter. read more …read more Read more here: Creation Moments
When God sealed Noah and his family inside the Ark, He closed the door on Noah’s world forever. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
By radio@answersingenesis.org (Steve Ham) Answering Bill Nye: Can Natural Laws Change? …read more Read more here: Answers Conversation
The Wall Street Journal is praising psychological interventions on kindergarteners that demonstrate how repeated picture-stories can train them to suppress their intelligent design inferences about the world with natural selection…and this may be permanent. More… …read more Read more here: icr.org
By Creation Moments Evolutionists, trying to answer creationist arguments, have suggested that there is an “error” in the design of the eye that any wise Creator would not have made. That “error” in design, as evolutionists call it, is that the retina of the mammal’s eye is “inside out” – the light entering the eye passes through other eye tissue before hitting the photoreceptors. But is this really an error in design? read more …read more Read more here: Creation Moments
Are these ancient heaths and mires really 10,000 years old or more? …read more Read more here: creation.com
God designed “man’s best friend” to produce a vast array of types, each with a suite of traits just right for a special need. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
Despite scoffers over the years, the ‘legends’ and ‘stories’ about these creatures from seafarers are actually based on fact. …read more Read more here: creation.com
By Creation Moments Computer scientists, in trying to build a machine that sees like we do, have been studying how the eye works the miracle of vision. What they are discovering provides more scientific evidence that evolution is nothing more than a modern fairy tale for adults. read more …read more Read more here: Creation Moments
By Ken Ham I am now going to publicly ask astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson (host of the new Cosmos TV series) the same question I asked Bill Nye during our February debate at the Creation Museum—and the same question I’ve publicly asked Bill Nye on my Facebook and blog a number of times: “Can you name one piece of technology that could only have been developed starting with a belief in molecules-to-man evolution?” I am asking Tyson this question because, as Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell states in her article, “in an interview posted on National Geographic’s website on June 6, [Tyson
[More]
While we agree that it is important to know the truth, Tyson’s trusted source and conclusions differ radically from ours. …read more Read more here: AIG Daily
By Creation Moments Scientists have tried to tackle the job of creating a machine that is able to see as well as the human eye. In the process, they are gaining a new appreciation for the wonderful gift of sight. read more …read more Read more here: Creation Moments
By Ken Ham In a recent article regarding the atheistic, evolutionary Cosmos TV series hosted by Neil deGrasse Tyson, Time reports, Though the show had received a fair amount of attention for its head-on approach to hot-button scientific topics like evolution and climate change, Tyson shrugged off any notion that those issues were “controversial.” They’re just science, he said, and there’s nothing controversial about them. Climate Change and Science Now when Tyson equated man-made “climate change” with “science,” he is falsely indoctrinating people, just as the atheists do when they call evolution “science.” Not because climate change doesn’t occur—it does—but
[More]
Tips on how to keep debates with friends on origins on topic. …read more Read more here: creation.com
Life science textbooks have long taught that Neo-Darwinism explains how single cells evolved into sentient scientists, but not all scientists agree. Do they disagree because of a blind adherence to religion that opposes Darwinian science, or because they have examined the issues and found the science lacking? More… …read more Read more here: icr.org
By Creation Moments According to evolutionary theory, all matter and energy were the result of a huge explosion called the “Big Bang.” The laws that matter and energy must follow are also the result of that same great explosion. As a further result of these beliefs, evolutionists are convinced that things behave the way they do quite accidentally. read more …read more Read more here: Creation Moments