Proof The Bible Is True

When investigating true-vs.-false controversies, words are very important. Yet Christians sometimes unintentionally perpetuate false teachings by using misleading terms that accommodate evolutionary assumptions.1,2 This is what law courts call confusion of issues, a truth-interference problem so serious that trial judges, invoking Evidence Rule 403, ban such confusing terminology when admitting trial evidence.3   For example, the origin of species is a confusing topic. What exactly is a species? How can we properly analyze and discuss our origins if the words we use mean different things to different people? Consider this approach by Wikipedia, the multi-anonymous online encyclopedia that institutionally assumes [More]

By Ken Ham Nearly everyone loves the creamy, sweet taste of a well-made fudge. At both the Ark Encounter and the Creation Museum, we sell Uncle LeRoy’s Fudge, which is made fresh in small batches each day right on the property. It smells tempting as you tour the Ark gift shop and the Legacy Hall bookstore at the Creation Museum. And now you can get a behind-the-scenes look at how it’s made with Uncle LeRoy himself—and watch him try to teach Bodie and me how to do it! Normally on Mondays (as well as Thursdays) at 2 p.m. EST, I [More]

The psalmist said we are “fearfully and wonderfully made.” What insights can we glean from science to increase our wonder and honor our Creator? Mr. Sherwin highlights several features of human body systems that debunk evolutionary theory and glorify the Lord Jesus Christ.   Listen: The Amazing Human Body | The Institute for Creation Research

Do we need experts to interpret the Bible for us, or can we understand it for ourselves? ICR’s National Representative, Dr. Randy Guliuzza, discusses the doctrine of biblical clarity and why it matters. You’ll also hear about ICR’s upcoming event in El Paso, Texas, and a new podcast that will help you start your day with timely truths from God’s Word.   Listen: Can We Understand the Bible for Ourselves? | The Institute for Creation Research

By Jeremy Ham How much did the disciples and others really understand about the reason Jesus came to earth? …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Sarah Chaffee On this episode of ID the Future, Nancy Pearcey returns to explain what historians know, but few of the rest of us do: If anything, Charles Darwin’s science grew out of his naturalistic philosophy, not the other way around. One historian said Darwin’s naturalism came first, and “only later did he find a theory to validate his convictions.” His “bulldog”, T.H. Huxley, liked Darwinism more for its philosophy than its science. And even Darwin admitted the evidence wasn’t all it could or should be. Please consider donating to support the IDTF Podcast. Your browser does not support [More]

What is DNA? Why is it important? And how does it reveal the handiwork of the omnipotent Designer? Discover the code of life as Mr. Sherwin unwinds the microscopic ladder of biological information our cells need to function and thrive.   Listen: DNA | The Institute for Creation Research

While I was chatting once with an inmate at a Pennsylvanian prison, he told me that upon his arrival a guard wryly said he was free to do whatever he wanted…so long as it was regulated. Regulations are a method of control using rules in lieu of physical handling. Since regulatory control over systems, processes, and behaviors is often essential, regulations are pervasive in organizations—and also in biology. If engineered control systems and biological regulatory systems are both based on rules, how similar are they?   Read More: Engineered Adaptability: Biological Networks Feature Finest Engineering Principles | The Institute for [More]

Archaeopteryx is a big word that simply means “ancient wing.” It refers to a set of fossils of a strange-looking extinct bird. Books promoting evolution often show pictures of Archaeopteryx. Its beak had small teeth, so many scientists see it as playing a lead role in an unthinkably long plot about reptiles evolving into birds. Others admit it was just a bird. New research places Archaeopteryx more firmly in the bird category than ever before.   Read More: Does Archaeopteryx Show Bird Evolution? | The Institute for Creation Research

Time to clear up the confusion caused by misleading use of the term ‘fitness’. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Dr. Danny R. Faulkner What’s up in 2019? The year begins with a bang, for on the morning of January 1, the moon and Venus will be close together in the sky. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

By Ken Ham We’re very excited about the progress being made on the current Creation Museum upgrades. Recently, we opened the high-tech 4D Special Effects Theater, created a new entrance to the vast new parking lot, widened nature trails, installed an impressive children’s playground, widened passageways in the museum’s walkthrough, and put in additional restrooms. The world-class museum is now eleven years old and is in need of some upgrades to better communicate the creation/gospel message in our changing culture. Our artistic, attractions content, and fabrications teams are hard at work planning and building these new exhibits—and you can get [More]

A Polish research duo described the remains of an elephant-size synapsid from upper Triassic rocks. Only it’s not supposed to be there. Secular reactions express shock at this turn from a longstanding evolutionary tale. Synapsids are commonly referred to as “mammal-like reptiles,” but were neither reptiles nor mammals. They were unique—the sail-finned dimetrodon was a synapsid. Like dinosaurs, … More… …read more Source: icr.org     

The author is an Assistant Professor of Biology at Waynesburg University. Rossiter appears to have had a roller-coaster experience in terms of faith. He claims to have once been a Christian, then renounced the faith, and become an atheist (p. 1). He describes his atheism as having been of a cantankerous kind (p. 3). Years later, he professedly became a Christian after experiencing a bout with near-death (p. 4).   Throughout this work, the author engages in a systematic debunking of so-called theistic evolution. He also deconstructs the positions of oft-quoted evolutionists, such as Francisco Ayala, Richard Dawkins, Karl W. [More]

“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1) It is appropriate for Christians to begin the New Year by referring back to the beginning of the very first year. The first verse of God’s Word is also its most important verse, since it is the foundation on which everything else is built. Even God’s gr… More… …read more Source: icr.org     

By Ken Ham Here at Answers in Genesis we have a heart for reaching the world with the gospel and biblical authority message. That’s why we have offices around the world including in Peru, Australia/New Zealand, England, Canada, and Latin America. We also send our speakers to other countries such as India, Japan, Egypt, Romania, and many more. And we partner with like-minded individuals around the world to reach even more people—including millions of Arabic speaking peoples. Dr. Nagy Iskander, a retired Egyptian surgeon who now lives in Scotland, leads an incredible outreach to the 350 million Arabic speaking peoples [More]

By Sarah Chaffee On this episode of ID the Future from the vault, David Boze and Dr. John West conclude their conversation on The Magician’s Twin: C. S. Lewis on Science, Scientism, and Society. They discuss Lewis’ views on the limitations of science and the need for moral restraints; what Lewis meant by “men without chests”; and what kind of call-to-action should come from reading C. S. Lewis.Your browser does not support playing Audio, please upgrade your browser or find our podcast on podOmatic Download Episode For more information, visit C. …read more Source: id the future     

By Dr. Don DeYoung There have been many attempts to explain the Christmas Star scientifically, and three will be mentioned here. …read more Source: AIG Daily     

On Christmas Eve, December 24, 1968, the crew of Apollo 8 read from the Genesis account of creation. …read more Source: creation.com     

By Ken Ham It’s hard to believe Answers in Genesis is already celebrating 25 years in ministry. God has done remarkable things over the past 25 years! And even though we’ve grown markedly and changed, we haven’t changed in one specific way: we still remain faithful to our core mission and purpose—to equip the church to stand boldly on the authority of God’s Word from the very first verse and to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ. We’re humbled and grateful for what God has done. What started out as a ministry with three founders and a handful of employees [More]

We at the Institute for Creation Research, now in its 49th year, are thankful for God’s many blessings upon our ministry. Through it all, His providential hand has unmistakably guided our steps, supplied our needs, and enabled us to plan for the future. By God’s grace, ICR is reaching more people today than ever before with the scientific evidence that the Bible is right and its message is true. All glory to Him!   By God’s grace, ICR is reaching more people today than ever before with the scientific evidence that the Bible is right and its message is true. [More]

What does Grand Canyon tell us about the Genesis Flood? ICR geologist Dr. Tim Clarey uncovers the evidence and shares about his work with the ICR Discovery Center.   Can Christians be confident about the origin of life? And what are genetic clocks? ICR geneticist Dr. Jeff Tomkins explains how genetic research confirms the Bible.   Listen: Grand Canyon and Genetic Clocks Confirm the Bible | The Institute for Creation Research

By Sarah Chaffee On this episode of ID the Future, author and Center for Science and Culture fellow Nancy Pearcey responds to the claim that the design-oriented view of biology “lost” to an overwhelming scientific revolution, Darwinism, and subsequent discoveries have only put more nails in the design argument’s coffin. There was a revolution, Pearcey acknowledges, but at its core it was philosophical and ideological, one with no room for intelligent design in biology. “Without Hegel there would have been no Darwin,” Pearcey explains. Your browser does not support playing Audio, please upgrade your browser or find our podcast on [More]

By Ken Ham New research reveals ichthyosaurs, extinct marine creatures, likely had blubber, smooth skin, countershading, and were warm-blooded. Now that’s interesting and will certainly prompt scientists to take another look at this fascinating creature. But the real story here is one you have to read between the lines to get. Johan Lindgren, the lead researcher on this study published in Nature, states of the find: This animal’s preservation is unusual, especially for a marine environment . . . This specimen has given us more evidence that these tissues and molecules can preserve for extremely long periods, and that soft [More]

Does CMI just bash evolution? Learn about both the positive and negative arguments in biblical apologetics. …read more Source: creation.com     

When it comes to explaining how our universe came into being, widespread speculation is embraced over hard evidence. …read more Source: creation.com     

The lovable, designed gecko makes the news again this year.1 In 2009, it was discovered the gecko had amazing nocturnal vision.2 Even their sophisticated feet that secrete phospholipids, complex membrane molecules, are a wonder of creation.3 The impediment of directional hearing in small animals, such as the gecko, is cleverly solved by the Creator’s design. In larger creatures, … More… …read more Source: icr.org