Proof The Bible Is True

For more details visit: http://creation.com/cml73 Grand Canyon is often described as forming in a “millions of years” timescale. Do radioisotope dating methods support this scenario? Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss some conflicting results revealed by evolutionary geologists. Main article: From Creation magazine 27(3) Radioisotope dating of rocks in the Grand Canyon (http://creation.com/radioisotope-dating-of-rocks-in-the-grand-canyon) Related articles • The pigs took it all (http://creation.com/the-pigs-took-it-all) • RATE group reveals exciting break-through! (http://creation.com/rate) • Billion-fold Acceleration of Radioactivity Demonstrated in Laboratory (http://creation.com/billion-fold-acceleration-of-radioactivity-demonstrated-in-laboratory) • The collapse of ‘geologic time’ (http://creation.com/the-collapse-of-geologic-time) • How old is the Grand Canyon? (http://creation.com/grand-canyon-age) For more information on the creation/evolution issue [More]

For more details visit: http://creation.com/cml71 Many people think radioisotope dating methods are an exact science that can determine the age of things conclusively. Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss an article by Geologist Tas Walker from Creation magazine that shows how dating methods really work. Main article: From Creation magazine 30(3) How dating methods work (http://creation.com/how-dating-methods-work) Related articles • The way it really is: little-known facts about radiometric dating (http://creation.com/dating_reality) • Dating doubt (http://creation.com/focus-222#dating) • The Failure of U-Th-Pb ‘Dating’ at Koongarra (http://creation.com/koongarra) • Flaws in dating the earth as ancient (http://creation.com/flaws-in-dating-the-earth-as-ancient) • National Geographic magazine plays the dating game [More]

Mirror of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hUhFVmte0Y Please rate and comment freely.

Carl Kerby of Reasons for Hope (www.rforh.com) gives a simple illustration of what Carbon Dating is, as well as radio-isotope dating, and what it actually shows us.

Most people realize that evolution requires the belief in billions of years of earth history. Yet few people are aware that nine out of ten dating methods indicate the earth is too young for evolution to have happened, nor do they understand the assumptions upon which all dating methods rely. Using unforgettable visual demonstrations, Bruce Malone reveals how both science and Scripture indicate that the Earth is relatively young. Listeners will learn the limitations of science when determining the age of any anything and grow in their trust in God’s word. The foundation of old age dating methods, upon which [More]

Does radioisotope dating provide solid scientific evidence for ‘billions of years’? This episode summarizes huge problems with this dating method and highlights recent research results that supports a young earth. According to creation.com All episodes of Creation magazine LIVE! are free to watch, download to your computer and copy.

Seminar by Larry Vardiman, Ph.D. Seattle Creation Conference, 2005. Description: Radioisotope dating has become the standard method for estimating the age of the Earth. Yet, the millions and billions of years estimated by this method conflicts with the thousands of years that the Bible indicates to be the age of the Earth. An eight-year research project designed to explore the claims of radioisotope dating for an old earth and to offer a young-earth alternative will be completed by the Institute for Creation Research and the Creation Research Society in 2005. The RATE project has found several major pieces of evidence [More]