Does the Evidence REALLY Support Human Evolution? (Part I) – Apologetics Press

Share it with your friends Like

Thanks! Share it with your friends!

Close

Many ardent evolutionists are apparently unaware of the fact that, according to experts, human evolution is not only unsubstantiated, but that the evidence stands against it. While a person has the freedom to continue to believe it, he should realize that he must maintain a blind faith in order to do so.

 

Macroevolution1 is the belief that all extant species emerged from previous species, beginning with a simple, single-celled organism. Macroevolution is accepted as true by the bulk of mainstream scientists, even though, without a God, it does not even have the means to get started on its path from single-celled organisms to humans.

 

No sufficient evidence exists to support the blind belief that life could come from non-life, much less life that is equipped with an operating program, genetic information, and the ability to reproduce itself. The evidences which are claimed to support biological evolution, without fail, end up being irrelevant, inadequate, or even erroneous upon deeper investigation. But what about these supposed evidences of human evolution?

 

Read More: Does the Evidence REALLY Support Human Evolution? (Part I) – Apologetics Press

  • Rating:
  • Views:278 views
  • Categories: Biology