Ernst Haeckel: ‘An Embryonic Liar’

Share it with your friends Like

Thanks! Share it with your friends!

Close Breakthroughs in Understanding Horseshoe Crab Clotting Proteins Hold Promise Nuclear physicist embraces biblical creation Homology and Embryology Questions and Answers Claim #1: Haeckel’s Embryos; (ii) Proven false in 1874 by Professor Wilhelm His, Sr. Haeckel: legacy of fraud to popularise evolution Pauli J. Ojala and Matti Leisola Jonathan Sarfati Genesis, history and Haeckel’s diagrams This week we have two correspondents. BF from Canada makes the common mistake that Genesis, if taken as a polemic against pagan gods, is not meant to be history, as CMI’s Dr Jonathan Sarfati shows. BG from Australia informs us that Haeckel’s embryos, which were shown to be fraudulent over 100 years ago, are still used to teach evolution in universities today. CMI’s Dr David Catchpoole responds. April 2002 Discover magazine said (as we cited in The Universe is nothingness! The latest cosmological wild ‘guess’?!: The universe burst into something from absolutely nothing—zero, nada. And as it got bigger, it became filled with even more stuff that came from absolutely nowhere. How is that possible? Ask Alan Guth. His theory of inflation helps explain everything. The Universe is nothingness! Creation / Evolution Video Play Lists

  • Rating:
  • Views:1,246 views
  • Categories: History